All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wait: introduce prepare_to_wait_event()
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:07:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130607130723.GA2777@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130606213636.GJ5045@htj.dyndns.org>

Hi Tejun,

On 06/06, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Which tree are the patches based on?  I'm getting conflicts on
> linus#master, mmotd and next.

Hmm. linus#master. I just verified that the patches apply cleanly
after git-pull.

> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks,

> But a couple nits.
>
> > +int
>
> I don't think we need to keep the unnecessary line break here.  All
> other functions in the file don't do it except for the two
> prepare_to_wait functions.  No need to give the weirdos more power. :)

Yes, I tried to follow the style around the new helper, but the extra
line is not needed.

Please see v2 below, no other changes.

> > +prepare_to_wait_event(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
> > +{
> > +	if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
> > +		return -ERESTARTSYS;
> > +
> > +	wait->private = current;
> > +	wait->func = autoremove_wake_function;
> > +	prepare_to_wait(q, wait, state);
>
> I wonder whether it'd be worthwhile to make prepare_to_wait() inline
> so that it can be inlined into the above.  I think gcc is smart enough
> to emit inline for in-file stuff and then build a proper function for
> external references.  No biggie.  Just wondering.

Not sure... As you can see from this patch, I like -Os more than -O2 ;)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] wait: introduce prepare_to_wait_event()

Add the new helper, prepare_to_wait_event() which should only be used
by wait_event_common/etc.

prepare_to_wait_event() returns -ERESTARTSYS if signal_pending_state()
is true, otherwise it calls prepare_to_wait(). This allows to uninline
the signal-pending checks in wait_event_*.

Also, it can initialize wait->private/func. We do not care they were
already initialized, the values are the same. This also shaves a couple
of insns from the inlined code.

Unlike the previous change, this patch "reliably" shrinks the size of
generated code for every wait_event*() call.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/wait.h |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 kernel/wait.c        |   13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index 392c54d..a2314dd 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -176,28 +176,27 @@ wait_queue_head_t *bit_waitqueue(void *, int);
 #define __wait_no_timeout(tout)	\
 	(__builtin_constant_p(tout) && (tout) == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
 
-/* uglified signal_pending_state() optimized for constant state */
-#define __wait_signal_pending(state)					\
-	((state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) ? signal_pending(current) :	\
-	 (state == TASK_KILLABLE) ? fatal_signal_pending(current) :	\
-	  0)
+#define __wait_interruptible(state)					\
+	(!__builtin_constant_p(state) ||				\
+	 	state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE || state == TASK_KILLABLE)
 
 #define __wait_event_common(wq, condition, state, tout)			\
 ({									\
-	DEFINE_WAIT(__wait);						\
-	long __ret = 0, __tout = tout;					\
+	long __ret, __tout = tout;					\
+	wait_queue_t __wait;						\
+									\
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&__wait.task_list);				\
+	__wait.flags = 0;						\
 									\
 	for (;;) {							\
-		prepare_to_wait(&wq, &__wait, state);			\
+		__ret = prepare_to_wait_event(&wq, &__wait, state);	\
 		if (condition) {					\
 			__ret = __wait_no_timeout(tout) ?: __tout ?: 1;	\
 			break;						\
 		}							\
 									\
-		if (__wait_signal_pending(state)) {			\
-			__ret = -ERESTARTSYS;				\
+		if (__wait_interruptible(state) && __ret)		\
 			break;						\
-		}							\
 									\
 		if (__wait_no_timeout(tout))				\
 			schedule();					\
@@ -781,6 +780,7 @@ extern long interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(wait_queue_head_t *q,
  * Waitqueues which are removed from the waitqueue_head at wakeup time
  */
 void prepare_to_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state);
+int prepare_to_wait_event(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state);
 void prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state);
 void finish_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait);
 void abort_exclusive_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait,
diff --git a/kernel/wait.c b/kernel/wait.c
index 6698e0c..3b8619a 100644
--- a/kernel/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/wait.c
@@ -78,6 +78,19 @@ prepare_to_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_to_wait);
 
+int prepare_to_wait_event(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
+{
+	if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+		return -ERESTARTSYS;
+
+	wait->private = current;
+	wait->func = autoremove_wake_function;
+	prepare_to_wait(q, wait, state);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_to_wait_event);
+
 void
 prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
 {
-- 
1.5.5.1



      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-07 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-06 20:02 [PATCH 0/2] introduce wait_event_common() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-06 20:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] wait: introduce wait_event_common(wq, condition, state, timeout) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 22:06   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-19 16:14     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-06 20:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] wait: introduce prepare_to_wait_event() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-06 21:36   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-07 13:07     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130607130723.GA2777@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.