From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E18DE01516 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 06:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net [82.240.38.71]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ECED4B0126; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:06:11 +0200 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20130610150611.26c81882@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <1370618857-27287-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20130610144847.28cfce95@e6520eb> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 0/15] master-next pending updates X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:06:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:56:03 -0300, Otavio Salvador a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: >=20 > > Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:14:31 -0300, > > Otavio Salvador a =C3=A9crit : > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Otavio Salvador < > > otavio@ossystems.com.br>wrote: > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > meta-fsl-arm > > > > ------------ > > > > > > > > The patches 1, 2 and 3 (from meta-fsl-arm) are intended to be appli= ed > > > > on Monday; the other patches still need work and won't be applied n= ow > > > > > > > > > > These three patches has been merged. > > > > > > > > what rework is still needed for 11-12-13-14-15 ? > > >=20 > I have a build failure in my autobuilder yet and needs to fix it before please send it to the mailing list so that I can see if that's related to those patches. > merging those. I hadn't time to test the AMD related changes yet and Qt > needs also testing as people seem to had problem with X11. >=20 OK as said since the begining accelerated X11 is NOT supported by these patches so if X11 support is mandatory, please drop these patches. Eric