From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:41:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/03] ARM: 64-bit memory fixes, APE6EVM second memory bank Message-Id: <201306121441.35924.arnd@arndb.de> List-Id: References: <20130605104427.1720.68752.sendpatchset@w520> <201306051317.02284.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 June 2013, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> ARM: 64-bit memory fixes, APE6EVM second memory bank > >> > >> [PATCH 01/03] ARM: Let arm_add_memory() always use 64-bit arguments > >> [PATCH 02/03] ARM: Handle 64-bit memory in case of 32-bit phys_addr_t > >> [PATCH 03/03] ARM: shmobile: Add second memory bank to DTS for APE6EVM > >> > >> This patch set contains two fixes and one mach-shmobile specific patch > >> to add a second memory bank. The fixes attempt to improve the memory bank > >> handling in the ARM kernel in case of 64-bit addresses. > > > > Please have a look at this patch that Stepan Moskovchenko posted: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2639171/ > > > > I think we are going to need only one of the two approaches. > > Thanks for pointing out this implementation. Is there anything I can > do to move this forward? I'm fine with either solution. If Russell doesn't have a preference one way or the other, I'd suggest you agree with Stepan on one of the two and put that into the patch tracker. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:41:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/03] ARM: 64-bit memory fixes, APE6EVM second memory bank In-Reply-To: References: <20130605104427.1720.68752.sendpatchset@w520> <201306051317.02284.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <201306121441.35924.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 June 2013, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> ARM: 64-bit memory fixes, APE6EVM second memory bank > >> > >> [PATCH 01/03] ARM: Let arm_add_memory() always use 64-bit arguments > >> [PATCH 02/03] ARM: Handle 64-bit memory in case of 32-bit phys_addr_t > >> [PATCH 03/03] ARM: shmobile: Add second memory bank to DTS for APE6EVM > >> > >> This patch set contains two fixes and one mach-shmobile specific patch > >> to add a second memory bank. The fixes attempt to improve the memory bank > >> handling in the ARM kernel in case of 64-bit addresses. > > > > Please have a look at this patch that Stepan Moskovchenko posted: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2639171/ > > > > I think we are going to need only one of the two approaches. > > Thanks for pointing out this implementation. Is there anything I can > do to move this forward? I'm fine with either solution. If Russell doesn't have a preference one way or the other, I'd suggest you agree with Stepan on one of the two and put that into the patch tracker. Arnd