From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn <oleksandr.dmytryshyn@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: omap: correct usage of the interrupt enable register
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:20:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130612182046.GC3018@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370245040-14753-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.dmytryshyn@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1588 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:37:20AM +0300, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote:
> We've been lucky not to have any interrupts fire during the suspend
> path, otherwise we would have unpredictable behaviour in the kernel.
>
> Based on the logic of the kernel code interrupts from i2c should be
> prohibited during suspend. Kernel writes 0 to the I2C_IE register in
> the omap_i2c_runtime_suspend() function. In the other side kernel
> writes saved interrupt flags to the I2C_IE register in
> omap_i2c_runtime_resume() function. I.e. interrupts should be disabled
> during suspend.
>
> This works for chips with version1 registers scheme. Interrupts are
> disabled during suspend. For chips with version2 scheme registers
> writting 0 to the I2C_IE register does nothing (because now the
> I2C_IRQENABLE_SET register is located at this address). This register
> is used to enable interrupts. For disabling interrupts
> I2C_IRQENABLE_CLR register should be used.
>
> Because the registers I2C_IRQENABLE_SET and I2C_IE have the same
> addresses, the interrupt enabling procedure is unchanged.
>
> I've checked that interrupts in the i2c controller are still enabled
> after writting 0 to the I2C_IRQENABLE_SET register. With this patch
> interrupts are disabled in the omap_i2c_runtime_suspend() function.
>
> Patch is based on:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> tag: v3.10-rc2
>
> Verified on OMAP4430.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn <oleksandr.dmytryshyn@ti.com>
Kevin, I think you are fine with this patch now?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-03 7:37 [PATCH v5] i2c: omap: correct usage of the interrupt enable register Oleksandr Dmytryshyn
2013-06-03 7:37 ` Oleksandr Dmytryshyn
2013-06-12 18:20 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <1370245040-14753-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.dmytryshyn-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-19 10:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-06-19 10:05 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130612182046.GC3018@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr.dmytryshyn@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.