From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:24:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding In-Reply-To: <201306130020.30437.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1370623671-7748-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20130612220250.GA14852@obsidianresearch.com> <201306130020.30437.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <201306130024.14368.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 13 June 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Yes, I realize that, which is why I said it depends on the actual sizes. > If you have a lot of windows that are all the same size and nothing larger, > the worst case isn't too bad. Also, if the available space is a naturally aligned address range with a power-of-two size itself, the order does not matter at all and any order is as good as any other. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:24:14 +0200 Message-ID: <201306130024.14368.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1370623671-7748-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20130612220250.GA14852@obsidianresearch.com> <201306130020.30437.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201306130020.30437.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Maen Suleiman , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 June 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Yes, I realize that, which is why I said it depends on the actual sizes. > If you have a lot of windows that are all the same size and nothing larger, > the worst case isn't too bad. Also, if the available space is a naturally aligned address range with a power-of-two size itself, the order does not matter at all and any order is as good as any other. Arnd