From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:37772 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756825Ab3FLXhm (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:37:42 -0400 From: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:38:05 +0200 References: <1370467100-10820-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <20130612230023.GA9016@quad.lixom.net> <1604160.oAKkaEhla1@flatron> In-Reply-To: <1604160.oAKkaEhla1@flatron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306130138.05692.heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , thierry.reding@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann , Sylwester Nawrocki , Mark Brown , Thomas Abraham Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 01:13:47 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > Hi Olof, > > On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 16:00:23 Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:48:56PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > Needs testing on other platforms as I could only compile test for > > > > them. > > > > How/who can help here? WHo has and still cares for other affected > > platforms? > > > > > > 66 files changed, 627 insertions(+), 1580 deletions(-) > > I will try to test this on Exynos 4 at work, if I somehow manage to find > any way to use PWM on our boards (other than already-tested PWM > clocksource). > > Unfortunately, except S3C6410, I don't have access to other platforms, or > at least I won't in any reasonable time. > > If I remember correctly, in case of my watchdog support cleanup, Kukjin > has been able to test it on S5P64x0. > > Heiko and Sylwester used to have some s3c24xx-based boards, not sure if > they still do and are interested in their support in mainline. > > So all left is S5PC100 (for which I couldn't find anyone who cares) and > Exynos5. > > > Nice cleanup. > > Thanks. > > > > Any comments for this series? > > > > Yes, above. :) In general looks good -- testing coverage is a bit of a > > concern. > > Yeah. Unfortunately all I could do was testing on Tiny6410 and compile > testing on others. I hope we find some really helpful people over here who > could waste a bit of their precious time for this museum. ;) I'll try to give it a testrun tomorrow. And my s3c2416 will always be the first-love-architecture for me ;-) Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:38:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup In-Reply-To: <1604160.oAKkaEhla1@flatron> References: <1370467100-10820-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <20130612230023.GA9016@quad.lixom.net> <1604160.oAKkaEhla1@flatron> Message-ID: <201306130138.05692.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 01:13:47 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > Hi Olof, > > On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 16:00:23 Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:48:56PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > Needs testing on other platforms as I could only compile test for > > > > them. > > > > How/who can help here? WHo has and still cares for other affected > > platforms? > > > > > > 66 files changed, 627 insertions(+), 1580 deletions(-) > > I will try to test this on Exynos 4 at work, if I somehow manage to find > any way to use PWM on our boards (other than already-tested PWM > clocksource). > > Unfortunately, except S3C6410, I don't have access to other platforms, or > at least I won't in any reasonable time. > > If I remember correctly, in case of my watchdog support cleanup, Kukjin > has been able to test it on S5P64x0. > > Heiko and Sylwester used to have some s3c24xx-based boards, not sure if > they still do and are interested in their support in mainline. > > So all left is S5PC100 (for which I couldn't find anyone who cares) and > Exynos5. > > > Nice cleanup. > > Thanks. > > > > Any comments for this series? > > > > Yes, above. :) In general looks good -- testing coverage is a bit of a > > concern. > > Yeah. Unfortunately all I could do was testing on Tiny6410 and compile > testing on others. I hope we find some really helpful people over here who > could waste a bit of their precious time for this museum. ;) I'll try to give it a testrun tomorrow. And my s3c2416 will always be the first-love-architecture for me ;-) Heiko