All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gleb@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:08:21 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130614000821.GA3183@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370595088-3315-1-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 04:51:22PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Changelog:
> V3:
>   All of these changes are from Gleb's review:
>   1) rename RET_MMIO_PF_EMU to RET_MMIO_PF_EMULATE.
>   2) smartly adjust kvm generation number in kvm_current_mmio_generatio()
>      to avoid kvm_memslots->generation overflow.
> 
> V2:
>   - rename kvm_mmu_invalid_mmio_spte to kvm_mmu_invalid_mmio_sptes
>   - use kvm->memslots->generation as kvm global generation-number
>   - fix comment and codestyle
>   - init kvm generation close to mmio wrap-around value
>   - keep kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes
> 
> The current way is holding hot mmu-lock and walking all shadow pages, this
> is not scale. This patchset tries to introduce a very simple and scale way
> to fast invalidate all mmio sptes - it need not walk any shadow pages and hold
> any locks.

Hi Xiao,

- Where is the generation number increased?
- Should use spinlock breakable code in kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes()
(picture guest with 512GB of RAM, even walking all those pages is
expensive) (ah, patch to remove kvm_mmu_zap_mmio_sptes does that).
- Is -13 enough to test wraparound? Its highly likely the guest has 
not began executing by the time 13 kvm_set_memory_calls are made
(so no sptes around). Perhaps -2000 is more sensible (should confirm
though).
- Why remove "if (change == KVM_MR_CREATE) || (change
==  KVM_MR_MOVE)" from kvm_arch_commit_memory_region?
Its instructive.

Otherwise looks good.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-14  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-07  8:51 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: MMU: retain more available bits on mmio spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: MMU: store generation-number into " Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: MMU: make return value of mmio page fault handler more readable Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10  7:57   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-10  8:45     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10 13:16     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-06-11  9:18       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-07  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-27  8:29   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27  9:01     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27  9:14       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27  9:21         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27  9:50           ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-27 10:19             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-27 11:05               ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-27 11:10                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-07  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: MMU: add tracepoint for check_mmio_spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-07  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: MMU: init kvm generation close to mmio wrap-around value Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10  7:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all mmio sptes Gleb Natapov
2013-06-10  8:39   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-10 13:43     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-06-10 17:03       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-19 11:08         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-19 11:27           ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-14  0:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2013-06-15  2:22   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-06-17 11:59     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-18 22:21       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-06-18 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-19  2:47   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-19 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130614000821.GA3183@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.