From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:54261 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757878Ab3FMW1k (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:27:40 -0400 From: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:27:33 +0200 References: <1370467100-10820-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <1808375.nuQYa2FdfG@flatron> <201306132217.44265.heiko@sntech.de> In-Reply-To: <201306132217.44265.heiko@sntech.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201306140027.34181.heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , thierry.reding@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann , Mark Brown , Thomas Abraham Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 22:17:43 schrieb Heiko St=EF=BF=BDbner: > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 11:07:38 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > Hi Heiko, Sylwester, > >=20 > > On Thursday 13 of June 2013 01:52:05 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > > On 06/13/2013 01:38 AM, Heiko St=EF=BF=BDbner wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 01:13:47 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > > >> Hi Olof, > > > >>=20 > > > >> On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 16:00:23 Olof Johansson wrote: > > > >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:48:56PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > >>>>> Needs testing on other platforms as I could only compile test f= or > > > >>>>> them. > > > >>>=20 > > > >>> How/who can help here? WHo has and still cares for other affected > > > >>> platforms? > > > >>>=20 > > > >>>>> 66 files changed, 627 insertions(+), 1580 deletions(-) > > > >>=20 > > > >> I will try to test this on Exynos 4 at work, if I somehow manage to > > > >> find any way to use PWM on our boards (other than already-tested P= WM > > > >> clocksource). > > > >>=20 > > > >> Unfortunately, except S3C6410, I don't have access to other > > > >> platforms, or at least I won't in any reasonable time. > > > >>=20 > > > >> If I remember correctly, in case of my watchdog support cleanup, > > > >> Kukjin > > > >> has been able to test it on S5P64x0. > > > >>=20 > > > >> Heiko and Sylwester used to have some s3c24xx-based boards, not su= re > > > >> if > > > >> they still do and are interested in their support in mainline. > > > >>=20 > > > >> So all left is S5PC100 (for which I couldn't find anyone who cares) > > > >> and > > > >> Exynos5. > > > >>=20 > > > >>> Nice cleanup. > > > >>=20 > > > >> Thanks. > > > >>=20 > > > >>>> Any comments for this series? > > > >>>=20 > > > >>> Yes, above. :) In general looks good -- testing coverage is a bit > > > >>> of a > > > >>> concern. > > > >>=20 > > > >> Yeah. Unfortunately all I could do was testing on Tiny6410 and > > > >> compile > > > >> testing on others. I hope we find some really helpful people over > > > >> here who could waste a bit of their precious time for this museum. > > > >> ;) > > > >=20 > > > > I'll try to give it a testrun tomorrow. And my s3c2416 will always = be > > > > the first-love-architecture for me ;-) > > >=20 > > > I'll likely test it tomorrow on a Mini2440 board, I was going to do it > > > earlier > > > but got distracted by plenty other things that needed attention too. = At > > > least > > > that's one of the reasons I got the board - testing the cross-platform > > > cleanups > > > and ensuring they are not breaking the older platforms. > >=20 > > Thank you both for your support. Looking forward for testing results :) >=20 > on a s3c2416-based machine for dt and non-dt case > [with the limit that my machine does not has anything connected to the pwm > outputs, so I only get to test the base-pwm and timer part] >=20 > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner And of course forgot the other thing: Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner Thanks for doing this, as with this series I can now also resurrect my s3c2= 416=20 ccf patch :-) Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:27:33 +0200 Message-ID: <201306140027.34181.heiko@sntech.de> References: <1370467100-10820-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <1808375.nuQYa2FdfG@flatron> <201306132217.44265.heiko@sntech.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:54261 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757878Ab3FMW1k (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:27:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201306132217.44265.heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , thierry.reding@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann , Mark Brown , Thomas Abraham Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 22:17:43 schrieb Heiko St=FCbner: > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 11:07:38 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > Hi Heiko, Sylwester, > >=20 > > On Thursday 13 of June 2013 01:52:05 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > > On 06/13/2013 01:38 AM, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 01:13:47 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > > >> Hi Olof, > > > >>=20 > > > >> On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 16:00:23 Olof Johansson wrote: > > > >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:48:56PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > >>>>> Needs testing on other platforms as I could only compile te= st for > > > >>>>> them. > > > >>>=20 > > > >>> How/who can help here? WHo has and still cares for other affe= cted > > > >>> platforms? > > > >>>=20 > > > >>>>> 66 files changed, 627 insertions(+), 1580 deletions(-) > > > >>=20 > > > >> I will try to test this on Exynos 4 at work, if I somehow mana= ge to > > > >> find any way to use PWM on our boards (other than already-test= ed PWM > > > >> clocksource). > > > >>=20 > > > >> Unfortunately, except S3C6410, I don't have access to other > > > >> platforms, or at least I won't in any reasonable time. > > > >>=20 > > > >> If I remember correctly, in case of my watchdog support cleanu= p, > > > >> Kukjin > > > >> has been able to test it on S5P64x0. > > > >>=20 > > > >> Heiko and Sylwester used to have some s3c24xx-based boards, no= t sure > > > >> if > > > >> they still do and are interested in their support in mainline. > > > >>=20 > > > >> So all left is S5PC100 (for which I couldn't find anyone who c= ares) > > > >> and > > > >> Exynos5. > > > >>=20 > > > >>> Nice cleanup. > > > >>=20 > > > >> Thanks. > > > >>=20 > > > >>>> Any comments for this series? > > > >>>=20 > > > >>> Yes, above. :) In general looks good -- testing coverage is a= bit > > > >>> of a > > > >>> concern. > > > >>=20 > > > >> Yeah. Unfortunately all I could do was testing on Tiny6410 and > > > >> compile > > > >> testing on others. I hope we find some really helpful people o= ver > > > >> here who could waste a bit of their precious time for this mus= eum. > > > >> ;) > > > >=20 > > > > I'll try to give it a testrun tomorrow. And my s3c2416 will alw= ays be > > > > the first-love-architecture for me ;-) > > >=20 > > > I'll likely test it tomorrow on a Mini2440 board, I was going to = do it > > > earlier > > > but got distracted by plenty other things that needed attention t= oo. At > > > least > > > that's one of the reasons I got the board - testing the cross-pla= tform > > > cleanups > > > and ensuring they are not breaking the older platforms. > >=20 > > Thank you both for your support. Looking forward for testing result= s :) >=20 > on a s3c2416-based machine for dt and non-dt case > [with the limit that my machine does not has anything connected to th= e pwm > outputs, so I only get to test the base-pwm and timer part] >=20 > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner And of course forgot the other thing: Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner Thanks for doing this, as with this series I can now also resurrect my = s3c2416=20 ccf patch :-) Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:27:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup In-Reply-To: <201306132217.44265.heiko@sntech.de> References: <1370467100-10820-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <1808375.nuQYa2FdfG@flatron> <201306132217.44265.heiko@sntech.de> Message-ID: <201306140027.34181.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 22:17:43 schrieb Heiko St?bner: > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 11:07:38 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > Hi Heiko, Sylwester, > > > > On Thursday 13 of June 2013 01:52:05 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > > On 06/13/2013 01:38 AM, Heiko St?bner wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013, 01:13:47 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > > >> Hi Olof, > > > >> > > > >> On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 16:00:23 Olof Johansson wrote: > > > >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:48:56PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > >>>>> Needs testing on other platforms as I could only compile test for > > > >>>>> them. > > > >>> > > > >>> How/who can help here? WHo has and still cares for other affected > > > >>> platforms? > > > >>> > > > >>>>> 66 files changed, 627 insertions(+), 1580 deletions(-) > > > >> > > > >> I will try to test this on Exynos 4 at work, if I somehow manage to > > > >> find any way to use PWM on our boards (other than already-tested PWM > > > >> clocksource). > > > >> > > > >> Unfortunately, except S3C6410, I don't have access to other > > > >> platforms, or at least I won't in any reasonable time. > > > >> > > > >> If I remember correctly, in case of my watchdog support cleanup, > > > >> Kukjin > > > >> has been able to test it on S5P64x0. > > > >> > > > >> Heiko and Sylwester used to have some s3c24xx-based boards, not sure > > > >> if > > > >> they still do and are interested in their support in mainline. > > > >> > > > >> So all left is S5PC100 (for which I couldn't find anyone who cares) > > > >> and > > > >> Exynos5. > > > >> > > > >>> Nice cleanup. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks. > > > >> > > > >>>> Any comments for this series? > > > >>> > > > >>> Yes, above. :) In general looks good -- testing coverage is a bit > > > >>> of a > > > >>> concern. > > > >> > > > >> Yeah. Unfortunately all I could do was testing on Tiny6410 and > > > >> compile > > > >> testing on others. I hope we find some really helpful people over > > > >> here who could waste a bit of their precious time for this museum. > > > >> ;) > > > > > > > > I'll try to give it a testrun tomorrow. And my s3c2416 will always be > > > > the first-love-architecture for me ;-) > > > > > > I'll likely test it tomorrow on a Mini2440 board, I was going to do it > > > earlier > > > but got distracted by plenty other things that needed attention too. At > > > least > > > that's one of the reasons I got the board - testing the cross-platform > > > cleanups > > > and ensuring they are not breaking the older platforms. > > > > Thank you both for your support. Looking forward for testing results :) > > on a s3c2416-based machine for dt and non-dt case > [with the limit that my machine does not has anything connected to the pwm > outputs, so I only get to test the base-pwm and timer part] > > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner And of course forgot the other thing: Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner Thanks for doing this, as with this series I can now also resurrect my s3c2416 ccf patch :-) Heiko