From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:28:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:38045 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6822996Ab3FPL2ss1df9 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:28:48 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5GBSi0e028719; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:28:44 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r5GBSiW6028718; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:28:44 +0200 Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:28:44 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: David Daney Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sanjay Lal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/31] mips/kvm: Hook into CP unusable exception handler. Message-ID: <20130616112844.GE20046@linux-mips.org> References: <1370646215-6543-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1370646215-6543-24-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370646215-6543-24-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 36927 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 04:03:27PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > From: David Daney > > The MIPS VZ KVM code needs this to be able to manage the FPU. > > Signed-off-by: David Daney Looks good, Acked-by: Ralf Baechle . However I get cold shivers at the thought of SMTC FPU management with VZ, it sounds like a source of new entertainment ... But thinkin gaobu this is something for another rainy day, not now. Ralf