From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of pinconf options
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:02:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306161302.32156.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY6pmS=5rphvYdt_8yKYJq8ADu0omy48ncZ3LFtEUf7yg@mail.gmail.com>
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:35:43 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Change the rockchip pinctrl driver to handle the arguments of 0 or 1 to
> > the pull pinconfig options correctly, so that the pull gets disabled when
> > either the bias_disable options is set or the pull option has the
> > argument 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>
> Patch applied so we can move ahead but:
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> >
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
> > + if (!rockchip_pinconf_pull_valid(info->ctrl, param))
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (!arg)
> > + param = PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
>
> This is what I think is counter-intuitive.
>
> Can't you rely on the bias-disable here instead?
>
> > - *config = 0;
> > + pull = rockchip_get_pull(bank, pin - bank->pin_base);
> > + *config = (pull == param) ? 1 : 0;
>
> And then I guess you should emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE
> here as well.
rockchip_get_pull does emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE when the pull is disabled,
only wrongly does add the argument here.
But I'm actually not quite sure what the expected behaviour is here at all :-)
Say the pin is in the "pin-default" pull state and the query in config_get is
for "bias-disable", what would be the expected bahviour/return value in this
case?
Thanks
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of pinconf options
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:02:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306161302.32156.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY6pmS=5rphvYdt_8yKYJq8ADu0omy48ncZ3LFtEUf7yg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:35:43 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Change the rockchip pinctrl driver to handle the arguments of 0 or 1 to
> > the pull pinconfig options correctly, so that the pull gets disabled when
> > either the bias_disable options is set or the pull option has the
> > argument 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> Patch applied so we can move ahead but:
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> >
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
> > + if (!rockchip_pinconf_pull_valid(info->ctrl, param))
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (!arg)
> > + param = PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
>
> This is what I think is counter-intuitive.
>
> Can't you rely on the bias-disable here instead?
>
> > - *config = 0;
> > + pull = rockchip_get_pull(bank, pin - bank->pin_base);
> > + *config = (pull == param) ? 1 : 0;
>
> And then I guess you should emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE
> here as well.
rockchip_get_pull does emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE when the pull is disabled,
only wrongly does add the argument here.
But I'm actually not quite sure what the expected behaviour is here at all :-)
Say the pin is in the "pin-default" pull state and the query in config_get is
for "bias-disable", what would be the expected bahviour/return value in this
case?
Thanks
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of pinconf options
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:02:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306161302.32156.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY6pmS=5rphvYdt_8yKYJq8ADu0omy48ncZ3LFtEUf7yg@mail.gmail.com>
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:35:43 schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Change the rockchip pinctrl driver to handle the arguments of 0 or 1 to
> > the pull pinconfig options correctly, so that the pull gets disabled when
> > either the bias_disable options is set or the pull option has the
> > argument 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>
> Patch applied so we can move ahead but:
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> >
> > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
> > + if (!rockchip_pinconf_pull_valid(info->ctrl, param))
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (!arg)
> > + param = PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
>
> This is what I think is counter-intuitive.
>
> Can't you rely on the bias-disable here instead?
>
> > - *config = 0;
> > + pull = rockchip_get_pull(bank, pin - bank->pin_base);
> > + *config = (pull == param) ? 1 : 0;
>
> And then I guess you should emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE
> here as well.
rockchip_get_pull does emit PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE when the pull is disabled,
only wrongly does add the argument here.
But I'm actually not quite sure what the expected behaviour is here at all :-)
Say the pin is in the "pin-default" pull state and the query in config_get is
for "bias-disable", what would be the expected bahviour/return value in this
case?
Thanks
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-16 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 15:41 [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: fix some issues with new pinconfig dt parsing Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 12:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: clarify some dt pinconfig options Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-19 22:10 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-19 22:10 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-24 9:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-24 9:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: handle zero found dt pinconfig properties better Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:29 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:29 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: dynamically alloc temp array when parsing dt pinconf options Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:31 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:31 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: rockchip: correctly handle arguments of " Heiko Stübner
2013-06-14 15:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 10:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 10:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 11:02 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2013-06-16 11:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 11:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 12:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 12:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Heiko Stübner
2013-06-16 15:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-17 15:48 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 15:48 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-14 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: fix some issues with new pinconfig dt parsing James Hogan
2013-06-14 15:53 ` James Hogan
2013-06-14 15:53 ` James Hogan
2013-06-17 3:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 3:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201306161302.32156.heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.