All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] s390: Replace weird use of PTR_RET.
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:03:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130617050310.GA4560@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371357768-4968-3-git-send-email-rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:12:42PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Saves repeating "(void __force *)__uptr" but it's less clear.  Using
> the output of PTR_RET() to determine the error rather than just
> testing IS_ERR() is odd.

Ok, if it's confusing I won't mind if it gets changed. I intended to
keep the code as short as possible, but.. ;)

> For example, I *assume* __gptr_to_uptr() never returns NULL?  Because
> the __ret would be 0 for the old code.  The new version is clearer, IMHO:
> it would try to get_user() on that address.

__gptr_to_uptr() could return 0 and it's not an error case. In that case
it should indeed try a to get_user() on that address.

> If you hate this variant, I can just s/PTR_RET/PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO/ instead.

Your patch is fine.

> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-17  5:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-01  9:56 [PATCH] virtio-mmio: Cocci spatch "ptr_ret.spatch" Thomas Meyer
2013-06-03  2:29 ` [RFC] PTR_ERR: return 0 if ptr isn't an error value Rusty Russell
2013-06-03  7:15   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-08 21:07     ` Julia Lawall
2013-06-13  4:37       ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-13  7:30         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-13  7:56           ` Julia Lawall
2013-06-16  2:44             ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42               ` [PATCH 1/9] PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 2/9] PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(): Replace most Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                   ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                   ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-20  6:05                   ` David Miller
2013-06-20  6:05                     ` David Miller
2013-06-20  6:05                     ` David Miller
2013-06-25  7:47                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25  7:47                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25  7:47                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 3/9] s390: Replace weird use of PTR_RET Rusty Russell
2013-06-17  5:03                   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 4/9] acpi: " Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 11:55                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 5/9] pinctrl: don't use PTR_RET() Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 6/9] remoteproc: " Rusty Russell
2013-06-17  3:15                   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2013-06-17  3:49                     ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 7/9] staging/zcache: " Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: remove weird PTR_ERR() in do_debug Rusty Russell
2013-06-19 18:43                   ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Remove " tip-bot for Rusty Russell
2013-06-16  4:42                 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm/oom_kill: remove weird use of ERR_PTR()/PTR_ERR() Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 18:11                   ` David Rientjes
2013-06-17  3:50                     ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-09  5:55     ` [RFC] PTR_ERR: return 0 if ptr isn't an error value Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130617050310.GA4560@osiris \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.