From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] lockless n_tty receive path Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:01:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20130617200138.GA8199@kroah.com> References: <1366039168-8510-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <1371302076-4688-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40517 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751836Ab3FQUBi (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:01:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371302076-4688-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Hurley Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 09:14:12AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > Greg, > > As before, this patchset is dependent on the 'ldsem patchset'. > The reason is that this series abandons tty->receive_room as > a flow control mechanism (because that requires locking), > and the TIOCSETD ioctl _without ldsem_ uses tty->receive_room > to shutoff i/o. > > It is also dependent on 'n_tty fixes' which I recently resent > to you. Thanks for rebasing all of this, and resending it. It's late in the 3.11 development cycle, so I'm going to wait unto 3.11-rc1 is out to queue it up for 3.12, to get it lots of testing in linux-next. So don't worry, they aren't lost, just waiting a few more weeks before I can apply them. thanks, greg k-h