All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:16:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306181916.41378.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130618191255.178d2f42@skate>

On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnd Bergmann,
> 
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:14:33 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > Using 0xffff0002 as a placeholder for the pcie translation is definitely
> > better than 0xffff0000 as you had before, but let me ask again in case
> > you missed it the last time (and sorry if I missed the answer):
> > 
> > Why not just put the actual translation here the way it happens for each
> > of the PCIe ports? With the definition here, the PCIe driver actually has no
> > way to figure out what settings the windows need to use!
> 
> Come on Arnd, this is something we have already discussed countless
> times with you.
> 
> We cannot define translations for each PCIe port because we don't
> know in advance how much I/O and memory space each PCIe device will
> request. This is the reason why we have one global range for I/O
> space and one global space for memory space, that are given to the
> Linux PCI core, which then dynamically assigns sub-ranges for each
> PCIe device into those two global ranges.

Could you just stop assuming that I'm an idiot and read my suggestion?

The information that this puts into the device-tree is not where things
are mapped by how things are connected in hardware. The mbus mapping
is the part that is variable, while the PCI mapping is actually fixed
in hardware.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Petazzoni
	<thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe
	<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
	Maen Suleiman <maen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth
	<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:16:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306181916.41378.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130618191255.178d2f42@skate>

On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnd Bergmann,
> 
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:14:33 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > Using 0xffff0002 as a placeholder for the pcie translation is definitely
> > better than 0xffff0000 as you had before, but let me ask again in case
> > you missed it the last time (and sorry if I missed the answer):
> > 
> > Why not just put the actual translation here the way it happens for each
> > of the PCIe ports? With the definition here, the PCIe driver actually has no
> > way to figure out what settings the windows need to use!
> 
> Come on Arnd, this is something we have already discussed countless
> times with you.
> 
> We cannot define translations for each PCIe port because we don't
> know in advance how much I/O and memory space each PCIe device will
> request. This is the reason why we have one global range for I/O
> space and one global space for memory space, that are given to the
> Linux PCI core, which then dynamically assigns sub-ranges for each
> PCIe device into those two global ranges.

Could you just stop assuming that I'm an idiot and read my suggestion?

The information that this puts into the device-tree is not where things
are mapped by how things are connected in hardware. The mbus mapping
is the part that is variable, while the PCI mapping is actually fixed
in hardware.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 11:25 [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:14   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:14     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:12     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:12       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:16       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-06-18 17:16         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:34     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:34       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:45         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:52         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:52           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:08           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:08             ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:29             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:29               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:37               ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-19 19:37                 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 17:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 17:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:24     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:24       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:39       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:39         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:44         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:44           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:47           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:47             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:59             ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:59               ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:10               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:10                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:27                 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:27                   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 20:49                   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:49                     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:55                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:55                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:10                       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:10                         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 17:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 17:39     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:43     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:43       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:51         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:02         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:02           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:10           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:10             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:39             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:39               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 16:58       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 16:58         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 17:58         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 17:58           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:03           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:03             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:17             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:17               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:39   ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 11:39     ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:17     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:17       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:33       ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:33         ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:48         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 12:48           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ARM: mvebu: Use the preprocessor on Armada 370/XP device tree files Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:16     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 22:09     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:09       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:03         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:15     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:15       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:18         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:21         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:21           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 18:22           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:22             ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 19:02             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:02               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:20               ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:20                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:40                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:40                   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:06                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:06                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 11:12     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 11:12       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:11       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:11         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 16:53         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 16:53           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 11:33   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 13:07   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 13:07     ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201306181916.41378.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.