From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:16:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v4 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround In-Reply-To: <20130619201805.GJ31667@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1371672446-21583-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <1371672446-21583-7-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20130619201805.GJ31667@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20130619221611.GC9518@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:18:05PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:07:20PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Now that mbus device tree binding has been introduced, remove the address > > decoding window management from this driver. > > A suitable 'ranges' entry should be added to the devbus-compatible node in > > the device tree, as described by the mbus binding documentation. > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia > > --- > > Greg, > > > > I'm Ccing you, since you're carrying the mvebu-devbus driver in your trees. > > This patch should be applied only after the MBus DT binding is accepted > > and/or merged; although I doubt we will see that happening any time soon. > > > > drivers/memory/mvebu-devbus.c | 64 ++----------------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > Since this MBus series is most likely for v3.12, Greg's tree will be > merged by then. At which time, we can decide if it's best to keep the > series together or continue to send devbus changes through him. I'm > fine either way, and but I have a preference for keeping the series > together. Ok, I'll ignore this then, as it shouldn't go into 3.11, and I don't have trees that go beyond that at this point in time. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:16:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20130619221611.GC9518@kroah.com> References: <1371672446-21583-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <1371672446-21583-7-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20130619201805.GJ31667@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130619201805.GJ31667-u4khhh1J0LxI1Ri9qeTfzeTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Jason Cooper Cc: Andrew Lunn , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Maen Suleiman , Lior Amsalem , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:18:05PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:07:20PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Now that mbus device tree binding has been introduced, remove the address > > decoding window management from this driver. > > A suitable 'ranges' entry should be added to the devbus-compatible node in > > the device tree, as described by the mbus binding documentation. > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia > > --- > > Greg, > > > > I'm Ccing you, since you're carrying the mvebu-devbus driver in your trees. > > This patch should be applied only after the MBus DT binding is accepted > > and/or merged; although I doubt we will see that happening any time soon. > > > > drivers/memory/mvebu-devbus.c | 64 ++----------------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > Since this MBus series is most likely for v3.12, Greg's tree will be > merged by then. At which time, we can decide if it's best to keep the > series together or continue to send devbus changes through him. I'm > fine either way, and but I have a preference for keeping the series > together. Ok, I'll ignore this then, as it shouldn't go into 3.11, and I don't have trees that go beyond that at this point in time. thanks, greg k-h