All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: add SMP support for non-secure switch
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:27:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130619232717.GF7870@lvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371121273-18763-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@linaro.org>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:01:11PM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
> To enable full SMP support, we have to switch all secondary cores
> into non-secure state also.
> 
> So we add an entry point for secondary CPUs coming out of low-power
> state and make sure we put them into WFI again after having switched
> to non-secure state.
> For this we acknowledge and EOI the wake-up IPI, then go into WFI.
> Once being kicked out of it later, we sanity check that the start
> address has actually been changed (since another attempt to switch
> to non-secure would block the core) and jump to the new address.
> 
> The actual CPU kick is done by sending an inter-processor interrupt
> via the GIC to all CPU interfaces except the requesting processor.
> The secondary cores will then setup their respective GIC CPU
> interface.
> 
> The address secondary cores jump to is board specific, we provide
> the value here for the Versatile Express board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h        |  1 +
>  arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c              | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h |  3 +++
>  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S
> index 656d99b..919f6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S
> @@ -54,6 +54,33 @@ _secure_monitor:
>  
>  	movs	pc, lr				@ return to non-secure SVC
>  
> +/*
> + * Secondary CPUs start here and call the code for the core specific parts
> + * of the non-secure and HYP mode transition. The GIC distributor specific
> + * code has already been executed by a C function before.
> + * Then they go back to wfi and wait to be woken up by the kernel again.
> + */
> +.globl _smp_pen
> +_smp_pen:
> +	mrs	r0, cpsr
> +	orr	r0, r0, #0xc0
> +	msr	cpsr, r0			@ disable interrupts
> +	ldr	r1, =_start
> +	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c12, c0, 0		@ set VBAR
> +
> +	bl	_nonsec_init
> +
> +	ldr	r1, [r3, #0x0c]			@ read GICD acknowledge
> +	str	r1, [r3, #0x10]			@ write GICD EOI
> +	adr	r1, _smp_pen
> +waitloop:
> +	wfi
> +	ldr	r0, =CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR	@ load start address

the name sysflags addr is a very vexpress specific thingy.

I think you need to call this something like SMP_SECONDARY_BOOT_ADDR or
whatever, which is more generic.

> +	ldr	r0, [r0]
> +	cmp	r0, r1			@ make sure we dont execute this code
> +	beq	waitloop		@ again (due to a spurious wakeup)
> +	mov	pc, r0
> +
>  #define lo(x) ((x) & 0xFFFF)
>  #define hi(x) ((x) >> 16)
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h
> index 56d0dd0..04545b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/armv7.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ int armv7_switch_nonsec(void);
>  
>  /* defined in cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S */
>  void _nonsec_init(void);
> +void _smp_pen(void);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARMV7_VIRT */
>  
>  #endif /* ! __ASSEMBLY__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c b/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c
> index 7876a77..6946e4d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,21 @@ static int get_gic_base_address(char **gicdptr)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +static void kick_secondary_cpus(char *gicdptr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int *sysflags;

again, I think the use of the name sysflags here is misunderstood.

> +
> +	sysflags = (void *)CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_NEED_CLEAR_BITS
> +	sysflags[1] = (unsigned)-1;

this feels like we're wrapping some vexpress-logic into some
pseudo-generic logic here.  It feels like there should be a function
provided by the board code, that we simply call.

void set_board_smp_boot_addr(unsigned long addr);

> +#endif
> +	*sysflags = (uintptr_t)_smp_pen;
> +	dmb();
> +
> +	/* now kick all CPUs (expect this one) by writing to GICD_SGIR */

s/expect/except/

> +	writel(1U << 24, &gicdptr[GICD_SGIR]);
> +}
> +
>  int armv7_switch_nonsec(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int reg, ret;
> @@ -130,7 +145,9 @@ int armv7_switch_nonsec(void)
>  	for (i = 0; i <= itlinesnr; i++)
>  		writel((unsigned)-1, &gicdptr[GICD_IGROUPRn + 4 * i]);
>  
> -	/* call the non-sec switching code on this CPU */
> +	kick_secondary_cpus(gicdptr);
> +
> +	/* call the non-sec switching code on this CPU also */
>  	_nonsec_init();
>  
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h b/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
> index 4f425ac..ade9e5b 100644
> --- a/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
> +++ b/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
> @@ -31,4 +31,7 @@
>  #include "vexpress_common.h"
>  #define CONFIG_BOOTP_VCI_STRING     "U-boot.armv7.vexpress_ca15x2_tc2"
>  
> +#define CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR 0x1c010030
> +#define CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_NEED_CLEAR_BITS
> +
>  #endif
> -- 
> 1.7.12.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-19 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13 11:01 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] ARMv7: Add HYP mode switching support Andre Przywara
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/7] ARM: prepare armv7.h to be included from assembly source Andre Przywara
2013-06-28  1:00   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-07-04  7:38     ` Andre Przywara
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: add secure monitor handler to switch to non-secure state Andre Przywara
2013-06-28  3:00   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/7] ARM: add assembly routine " Andre Przywara
2013-06-19 22:27   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-06-28  3:09   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: switch to non-secure state during bootm execution Andre Przywara
2013-06-19 23:13   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-06-28  3:18   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-07-04  7:42     ` Andre Przywara
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: add SMP support for non-secure switch Andre Przywara
2013-06-19 23:27   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2013-06-28  3:22   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: extend non-secure switch to also go into HYP mode Andre Przywara
2013-06-19 23:40   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-06-21 14:38   ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2013-06-25  8:27     ` Andre Przywara
2013-06-28  3:51   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-07-04 11:29     ` Andre Przywara
2013-06-13 11:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: VExpress: enable ARMv7 virt support for VExpress A15 Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130619232717.GF7870@lvm \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.