From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 7/7] omap mailbox move to drivers for v3.11 merge window Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:39:25 +0200 Message-ID: <201306210939.26007.arnd@arndb.de> References: <0MFrZm-1V3qHW1bmA-00EJsa@mx.kundenserver.de> <201306202146.27093.arnd@arndb.de> <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C504CD3DD@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:56996 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422753Ab3FUHjc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 03:39:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C504CD3DD@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Anna, Suman" Cc: Tony Lindgren , Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Friday 21 June 2013, Anna, Suman wrote: > Yes, we still have a plan for a generic subsystem, and these would form the > the base patches of OMAP adaptation towards that. OMAP mailbox was disabled > since couple of releases now because of the multi-platform enablement. There were > couple of different work-items needed on OMAP mailbox like fixing the multi-platform, > converting to DT and adapting to the new framework. The previous subsystem was > derived of the OMAP mailbox, so the first and last items were kinda automatic. The > newest one based on Jassi's work is not gonna reuse any OMAP stuff, so this series > handles the first one to avoid a huge pending patchset for OMAP on the generic > framework finalization. Ok, thanks for the explanation. Please also see the other email thread about the linux-next conflict. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:39:25 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL 7/7] omap mailbox move to drivers for v3.11 merge window In-Reply-To: <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C504CD3DD@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> References: <0MFrZm-1V3qHW1bmA-00EJsa@mx.kundenserver.de> <201306202146.27093.arnd@arndb.de> <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C504CD3DD@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <201306210939.26007.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 21 June 2013, Anna, Suman wrote: > Yes, we still have a plan for a generic subsystem, and these would form the > the base patches of OMAP adaptation towards that. OMAP mailbox was disabled > since couple of releases now because of the multi-platform enablement. There were > couple of different work-items needed on OMAP mailbox like fixing the multi-platform, > converting to DT and adapting to the new framework. The previous subsystem was > derived of the OMAP mailbox, so the first and last items were kinda automatic. The > newest one based on Jassi's work is not gonna reuse any OMAP stuff, so this series > handles the first one to avoid a huge pending patchset for OMAP on the generic > framework finalization. Ok, thanks for the explanation. Please also see the other email thread about the linux-next conflict. Arnd