From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:30:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] at91: cpuidle: Fix target_residency
In-Reply-To: <51C47B3F.1090508@atmel.com>
References: <1371818219-13060-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
 <51C474E9.40908@linaro.org> <51C47B3F.1090508@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <201306211830.21175.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 21 June 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I think it should go for 3.10 as it is fix and also for 3.9.8
> > (stable). May be I should have Cc stable@ ...
> 
> Well, so it doesn't sound like a regression if it was already present in 
> 3.9...
> 
> Moreover, it does not seem to be taken into account for all 
> configuration (seems not triggered for !tickless kernels).
> 
> So I suspect Arnd and Olof would not take it for 3.10-fixes...
> 
> Guys, you thoughts?
> 

Ah, I just sent out a pull request for fixes a minute before I saw
your mail. I can't tell how serious this bug is. We can certainly
mark it for stable, but unless this is a significant regression,
I'd apply it for 3.11 instead and wait for the backports to happen.

	Arnd