From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com>,
michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com,
gregory.clement@free-electrons.com,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com,
alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: misc: assign file->private_data in all cases
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:59:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625115944.28fc447b@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130624222642.GA24099@kroah.com>
Dear Greg Kroah-Hartman,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:26:42 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > However, this assignment was only done when the misc driver was
> > declaring a driver-specific ->open() operation in its
> > file_operations. This doesn't make sense, as the driver may not
> > necessarily have a custom ->open() operation, and might still be
> > interested in having file->private_data properly set for use in its
> > ->read() and write() operations.
> >
> > Therefore, we move the assignment of file->private_data outside of the
> > condition that tests whether a driver-specific ->open() operation was
> > defined.
>
> Does this solve a problem with an existing misc driver? Or are you just
> trying to be "safe" for future, broken, drivers?
This problem was spotted while implementing a dummy/example misc driver
for training purposes. I am not aware of any mainline misc driver
affected by this problem, but I haven't reviewed all misc drivers.
It simply seems to make sense to implement the feature of fa1f68db6ca
("drivers: misc: pass miscdevice pointer via file private data") in a
way that also allows misc drivers that do not provide their own
->open() operation to use it.
That said, I'm not sure why you call such drivers 'broken'.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-21 13:01 [PATCH] char: misc: assign file->private_data in all cases Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-21 13:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-24 22:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-25 9:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130625115944.28fc447b@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
--cc=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.