From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] vfs: check for integer overflows in posix_acl_alloc()
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:32:45 +0300
Message-ID: <20130625133245.GI5714@mwanda>
References: <20130624162719.GB32503@elgon.mountain>
 <20130624213709.GT29338@dastard>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: g@dastard, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130624213709.GT29338@dastard>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Yeah.  You're right.  When I look at it more closely the ext4
example is capped ext4_get_acl().  Sorry for the noise.

regards,
dan carpenter