From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Expose /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children unconditionally
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:52:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625215247.GC1726@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVxm2wHvLgexG6fZO+h1rNHC_qDCv6B+4XuANHgSQU4iw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:36:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 06/26, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:51:45PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > This is currently only available if CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, which
> >> > is hidden under CONFIG_EXPERT. It's generally useful functionality,
> >> > though, so expose it unconditionally.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> >> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> >
> > I didn't see the patch but I guess it is trivial and I agree with intent ;)
>
> The patch works, but "children" is only listed under task/<tid>, not
> under /proc/<pid>. Is that intentional? Fixing it would be a
> one-liner.
Yeah, it's intentional. Here some explanations from Oleg (check out
the whole thread, it's not that big https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/9/220)
in short this might require some more code, but i'll re-check tomorrow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 19:51 [PATCH] proc: Expose /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children unconditionally Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-25 20:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-06-25 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-25 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-25 21:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2013-06-25 22:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-26 7:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-06-26 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-26 16:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-26 21:05 ` [PATCH] proc: Document that /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children really is per-thread Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-27 6:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-01 16:49 ` Rob Landley
2013-07-01 17:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130625215247.GC1726@moon \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.