All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Michal Hocko' <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	'Anton Vorontsov' <anton@enomsg.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob@landley.net,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	rientjes@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:35:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626073557.GD29127@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005601ce6f0c$5948ff90$0bdafeb0$%kim@samsung.com>

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 02:50:06PM +0900, Hyunhee Kim wrote:
> In vmpressure, the pressure level is calculated based on the ratio
> of how many pages were scanned vs. reclaimed in a given time window.
> However, there is a possibility that "scanned < reclaimed" in such
> a case, THP page is reclaimed or reclaiming is abandoned by fatal
> signal in shrink_inactive_list, etc. So, with this patch, we just
> return "low" level when "scanned < reclaimed" by assuming that
> there are enough reclaimed pages.

I agree send lowevent in this case but you should write down why
lowevent send is better than ignoring in description. 

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmpressure.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c
> index 736a601..c6560f3 100644
> --- a/mm/vmpressure.c
> +++ b/mm/vmpressure.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ static enum vmpressure_levels vmpressure_calc_level(unsigned long scanned,
>  	unsigned long scale = scanned + reclaimed;
>  	unsigned long pressure;
>  

Please write when we encounter this case.

> +	if (reclaimed > scanned)
> +		return VMPRESSURE_LOW;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * We calculate the ratio (in percents) of how many pages were
>  	 * scanned vs. reclaimed in a given time frame (window). Note that
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-26  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 11:30 [PATCH v3] memcg: event control at vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-17 13:15 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  6:10   ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-18  8:00     ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-18 11:01       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 11:25         ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-19 11:59           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 11:31         ` [PATCH v4] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-19 12:53           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20  2:13             ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-20  2:17             ` [PATCH v5] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-20 12:16               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21  0:21                 ` [PATCH v6] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21  0:24                   ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21  1:22                     ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-21  9:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21 11:02                         ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 11:54                           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 12:40                             ` [PATCH v7] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 16:27                         ` [PATCH v6] " Minchan Kim
2013-06-21 16:44                           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-22  0:27                             ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-22  1:28                               ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-26  7:47                               ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-21 22:35                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-22  4:36                           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  4:51                             ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  5:50                               ` [PATCH] memcg: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  7:34                                 ` [PATCH] memcg: add interface to specify thresholds of vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-25 20:46                                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26  7:39                                   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:50                                     ` Kyungmin Park
2013-06-26  8:03                                       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:35                                 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-06-27  6:12                                   ` [PATCH v2] vmpressure: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating a pressure level Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-27  9:37                                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 15:35                                       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-27 16:11                                         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 18:05                                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-28 12:17                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 23:54                                           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-28  7:43                                             ` [PATCH v3] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-28 12:26                                               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 12:24                                             ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 13:55                                               ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-28 15:17                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 18:33                                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-26  7:34                               ` [PATCH v6] memcg: event control at vmpressure Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:31                             ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-25 16:07                           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130626073557.GD29127@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@enomsg.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hyunhee.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.