From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:54:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:51655 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6824769Ab3F0IyXMzBRy (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:54:23 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5R8sIIK030733; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:54:18 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r5R8sEbB030732; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:54:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:54:14 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Andrew Murray , Michal Simek , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, John Crispin , David Daney Subject: of_pci_range_parser patch series Message-ID: <20130627085414.GE20848@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 37163 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Andrew, I noticed that [1] is now in -next but not the MIPS patch [2], not the MicroBlaze patch [3]. What is the reason for that? If it's only the lack of an ack, here's mine for the MIPS version: Acked-by: Ralf Baechle Thanks, Ralf [1] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5218/ [2] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5217/ [3] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5216/