From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
"Penner, Miles J" <miles.j.penner@intel.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/PCI: quirk Thunderbolt PCI-to-PCI bridges
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:09:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627130940.GV9294@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372284901.30572.625.camel@ul30vt.home>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:15:01PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 14:59 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Alex]
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:22:10 +0300
> > >> Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > + if (!(pci_probe & PCI_NOASSIGN_ROMS)) {
> > >> > + pr_info("Thunderbolt host router detected disabling ROMs\n");
> > >> > + pci_probe |= PCI_NOASSIGN_ROMS;
> > >> > + }
> > >>
> > >> I wonder if this should just be the default on x86? Or do we allocate
> > >> ROM space to address some other platform where we need it and the BIOS
> > >> doesn't do it for the devices we care about?
> > >
> > > Good question. In our case it definitely helps to have pci=norom the
> > > default. Can't tell if it might break something that depends on the current
> > > behaviour.
> >
> > I think the current default behavior is that if the BIOS has assigned
> > the ROM BAR, we keep that assignment, and if it hasn't, we allocate
> > MEM space for it. And "pci=norom" means that we don't allocate MEM
> > space for it, even if the BIOS hasn't assigned it.
> >
> > "pci=norom" is only implemented on x86. I think most other arches
> > allocate MEM space for ROMs, with no way to turn that off. PA-RISC
> > seems to ignore ROMs (dino_fixup_bus()), but that looks like the
> > exception.
> >
> > I'm slightly concerned that if we make the x86 default be "never
> > assign space for ROMs unless the BIOS has done it," we might break
> > virtualized guests that need access to ROMs. Alex?
>
> Yep, I'm more than slightly concerned by that too. Whenever possible we
> want to pass the ROM to the guest since it may end up being a boot
> device or drivers within the guest may require it. We can pass the ROM
> to the guest from an image file, but that requires someplace from which
> to dump the image, which is usually PCI sysfs. Thanks,
OK, then I guess changing the default is out of the question. We don't want
to break things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 16:22 [PATCH 0/6] Thunderbolt workarounds take 2 Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI: acpiphp: do not check for SLOT_ENABLED in enable_device() Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 13:25 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 9:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 17:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-28 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-01 9:32 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-01 14:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-01 18:36 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-02 1:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 16:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 20:31 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-02 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI: acpiphp: enable_device(): rescan even if no new devices on slot Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 23:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 13:02 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:32 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 16:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 1:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 13:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI: introduce pci_trim_stale_devices() Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 17:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 17:56 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI: acpiphp: check for new devices on enabled host Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-26 9:39 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-27 19:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-28 9:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 16:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-28 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: acpiphp: look _RMV method a bit deeper in the hierarhcy Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 18:31 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 18:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 19:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-07-02 10:44 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-07-02 17:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 17:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-07-02 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/PCI: quirk Thunderbolt PCI-to-PCI bridges Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 21:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-06-26 12:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 15:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-26 20:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 22:15 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-27 13:09 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-06-26 22:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 22:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 22:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 23:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 17:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 13:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 13:54 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:27 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 17:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] Thunderbolt workarounds take 2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 7:25 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 12:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 19:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 19:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130627130940.GV9294@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.j.penner@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.