All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Block Layer Multi queue question
       [not found] <CANLX1YGQqbbNb5hgoHtcFS27KJmLtnC+JY6CnWsSBR3+KLO60g@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2013-06-27 14:21 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-06-27 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xun ni; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Thu, Jun 27 2013, xun ni wrote:
> Hello, Axboe:
> 
>    I read your article about the block io layer Multi-queue support SSD on
> the multi-core systems. And i do some experiment on raid5 which consist of
> 5 intel ssd disks. I get code from linux-block and checked out mq. After
> apply kent's patch , the raid5 system works. I tested the raid with FIO and
> find that the performance is not growing. 4k read iops down from 82k to
> 76k. 4k random write iops down from 14k to 9k. The latency is also down
> about 8%
>    So my question is that any configuration or modification is needed
> before testing the raid5 so that the Multi-queue method works and
> performance increase?

raid5/md isn't blk-mq aware at all. So that code path isn't really
changed at all. If you are seeing a change in performance, that must be
because the baseline is different (blk-mq sits on top of 3.10-rc, don't
know what you are comparing to). You should try 3.10-rc7 and see how
that fares, and report if you are seeing a performance degredation.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-06-27 14:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CANLX1YGQqbbNb5hgoHtcFS27KJmLtnC+JY6CnWsSBR3+KLO60g@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-27 14:21 ` Block Layer Multi queue question Jens Axboe

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.