From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17065298D for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r61G9D4R003268 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:09:13 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r61G9D7n010931 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:09:13 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:09:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (gtudedge.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r61G9D8b007579; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:09:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:09:13 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Siddharth Heroor Message-ID: <20130701160912.GF4588@edge> References: <20130701154756.GA1772@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130701154756.GA1772@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] packagegroups: Add new packagegroup for glsdk console X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:09:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:17:57PM +0530, Siddharth Heroor wrote: > * GLSDK supports a virtual console using KMS and GBM. This > packagegroup builds on top of the arago-console packagegroup. > * For OMAP5, we append ABE firmware. > * KMSCube is used as demonstration application So, what machines do you have in GLSDK? I thought those were all omap-a15 ones (omap5-evm and dra7xx-evm). Can we just make those as machine-overrides in original packagegroup and image recipes instead of creating new ones? Is there a use-case to have both versions of console packagegroup/image - one with KMS/GBM and one w/o? > Signed-off-by: Mrinmayee Hingolikar > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor > --- > .../packagegroup-arago-glsdk-console.bb | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-glsdk-console.bb > > diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-glsdk-console.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-glsdk-console.bb > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..da16db7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-glsdk-console.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +DESCRIPTION = "Extended task to get more basic and console apps in GLSDK" > +LICENSE = "MIT" > +PR = "r1" > + > +PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" > + > +inherit packagegroup > + > +ARAGO_GLSDK_CONSOLE = "\ > + libdrm \ > + libdrm-kms \ > + libgbm-glsdk \ > + cairo \ > + pixman \ > + expat \ > + omap5-sgx-ddk-um-linux \ > + omapdrm-pvr \ > + " > + > +ARAGO_GLSDK_CONSOLE_append_omap5-evm = "\ > + abefw \ > + " > + > +ARAGO_GLSDK_CONSOLE_DEMOS = "\ > + kmscube \ > + " > + > +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "\ > + ${ARAGO_GLSDK_CONSOLE} \ > + ${ARAGO_GLSDK_CONSOLE_DEMOS} \ > + " > + > +RRECOMMENDS_${PN} = "\ > + kernel-modules \ > + " > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > _______________________________________________ > meta-arago mailing list > meta-arago@arago-project.org > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago