All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	jslaby@suse.cz, alan@linux.intel.com, matts@commtech-fastcom.com,
	wfp5p@virginia.edu, tklauser@distanz.ch,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression]  serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:46:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702044641.GA6549@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D1AAF5.5050004@canonical.com>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:14:45PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Wang,
> 
> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0].  After a kernel bisect,
> it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> 
> commit 8d2f8cd424ca0b99001f3ff4f5db87c4e525f366
> Author: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Mar 1 11:47:20 2013 +0800
> 
>     serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology
> PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
> 
> 
> The regression was introduced as of v3.9-rc3 and still exists in the
> current Mainline tree.  It was also propagated to the stable trees.
> 
> The patch causes the device to use the serial module instead of
> parport_serial.  Maybe the the quirk in ~drivers/pci/quirks.c
> quirk_netmos() needs to be modified?
> 
> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this by
> you.  I was thinking of requesting a revert, but I wanted to get your
> feedback first.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
Hi all,
I am sorry for it and later reply.

But I am sure I have included the parport_serial in the
kernel for my consumers at the time they report their
PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller didn't work which cause
this "culprit" patch.

I don't have the card in hand right now, so I can't
dig into it. After stare into parport_serial.c, yes,
it seems like it will handle this pci serial card.

Maybe I forget or miss something, I hope.

Thanks.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-01 16:14 [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression] serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller Joseph Salisbury
2013-07-01 16:27 ` Greg KH
2013-07-01 18:48   ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-07-02  4:46 ` Wang YanQing [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130702044641.GA6549@udknight \
    --to=udknight@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matts@commtech-fastcom.com \
    --cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
    --cc=wfp5p@virginia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.