[U-Boot] [RFC] Supporting multiple variants of an SoC

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:45:46PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
> 
> In message <20130702162829.GG16630@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> > 
> > That said, when others have suggested something like this before,
> > Wolfgang has pointed out and NAK'd the idea of adding N different
> > configuration as that adds (potentially) a lot of build time for
> > custodians/etc that tend to build --soc or --arch or other group
> > targets.  So, what do we want to do here?  I guess longer term, if we
> > are able to focus on switching to Kconfig, it would become we provide a
> > generic defconfig for am335x (or imx6 or ...) with a best-fit-for-all
> > set and communities can provide tweaked binaries as needed.  But do we
> > want to think about any stop-gap solutions here?
> 
> You can always add extra defines on the make command line...

OK, I'm not spotting the easy way to do that.  Hint?  Thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130703/62dadb8c/attachment.pgp>