From: w@1wt.eu (Willy Tarreau)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Add .dts file for Netgear ReadyNAS 102
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 22:35:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703203541.GI16785@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130703202105.GE27003@titan.lakedaemon.net>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 04:21:05PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 12:09:36AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:48:08PM +0200, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
> > > > more bummer. Willy, mind posting what you have?
> >
> > Attached. Usual warning "this will destroy your device etc..." comes
> > with it.
>
> Thanks Willy!
>
> How much effort would it be to put this pig in drivers/staging? iirc,
> the only rule is that it has to compile...
I think we should at least get it to work again. Otherwise it's pointless
to pollute the kernel. No way to get any tester if all you get when you
load it is :
calling drivers/mtd/nand/armada_nand.c:3227 orion_nfc_probe
armada-nand nand.3: Initialize HAL based NFC in 8bit mode with DMA Disabled using BCH 4bit ECC
drivers/mtd/nand/armada_nand.c:3318:orion_nfc_probe irq=105
armada-nand: probe of nand.3 failed with error -12
Oh damn, I'm back in the code again trying to fix it now...
Also we must not put it into staging in its current shape as it
patches drivers/mtd. We must first apply Ezequiel's explanation
about the READID command to detect the ONFI flash. I don't know
how long this could take. I remember having noticed this difference
in later drivers that was not there without knowing what it was
about.
What makes me uncomfortable is that we have guys who have started
some clean work and in parallel we're doing some crap which will
discourage Marvell from reprioritizing their work. I'd rather keep
that as an out of tree patch so that nobody there claims that the
NAND driver already exists in the kernel.
Best regards,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-30 20:59 [RFC] Add .dts file for Netgear ReadyNAS 102 Arnaud Ebalard
2013-07-02 12:46 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-02 13:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-02 13:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-02 13:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-02 13:44 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-02 13:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-02 14:24 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-02 17:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-07-02 17:41 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-02 21:48 ` Arnaud Ebalard
[not found] ` <20130702220936.GC10215@1wt.eu>
2013-07-02 23:23 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-03 4:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 22:33 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-03 22:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 7:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-03 13:00 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-03 19:07 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 19:10 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-03 19:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 19:39 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-04 13:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-04 14:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-04 17:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-03 20:21 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-03 20:35 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2013-07-03 20:44 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-03 21:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 22:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 22:58 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-07-04 6:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-07-03 21:05 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-07-02 17:21 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-07-02 17:38 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-02 13:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-07-02 23:27 ` Arnaud Ebalard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130703203541.GI16785@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.