From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:42 +0200 Subject: On common struct clk in clock framework. In-Reply-To: <201307041258.49200.heiko@sntech.de> References: <2625323.Iy4l3LBv4H@amdc1227> <201307041258.49200.heiko@sntech.de> Message-ID: <201307041307.42397.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2013, 12:58:48 schrieb Heiko St?bner: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2013, 12:32:26 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > > On Thursday 04 of July 2013 10:21:27 mind entropy wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Tomasz Figa > > > > wrote: > > > > The examples you pointed are not using Common Clock Framework. See > > > > Documentation/clk.txt and drivers/clk/ for more information about > > > > CCF. > > > > > > > > As for s3c24xx, CCF driver for the whole platform is already merged > > > > for Linux 3.11. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tomasz > > > > > > Thanks TomasZ. I have gone through the docs and was quite confused. I > > > will have a look at the merge. > > > > Oops. It seems like s3c24xx clk driver is not merged yet. I don't know > > why I thought it is. Heiko (on CC) has been working on it and I remember > > seeing some patches from him. Sorry for misinformation. > > the ccf conversion should be ready, but at the time I submitted them, the > pwm rework [that got rid of the pwm-internal clocks] was still missing. > > At some point in the threads I lost track of its state, did the pwm rework > make it into 3.11 after all, or is it an early 3.12 change? of course I forgot the most important thing :-) There is a big red line between the clocks starting with the s3c2443 and the other s3c24xx before it - they have nearly nothing in common. The ccf driver I created [0] therefore only provides the clocks for s3c2443, s3c2416 and s3c2450, which are very similar. Heiko [0] http://patches.sntech.de/projects/linux-kernel/01_mailinglist/s3c2416- common-clk/