diff for duplicates of <20130707132607.00007188@unknown> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index d0e1d3c..66f0cc6 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -48,16 +48,16 @@ EA4500). > >>> Also I noticed that you named eth1's ethernet1-port node wrongly in > >>> (at least) your kirkwood conversion patch[2]; you used > >>> -> >>> ð1 { status = "okay"; ethernet1-port at 0 { must be @1--^ phy-handle +> >>> ð1 { status = "okay"; ethernet1-port@0 { must be @1--^ phy-handle > >>> =<ðphy1>; }; }; > >> -> >> Can you please try to leave ethernet1-port at 0 and match +> >> Can you please try to leave ethernet1-port@0 and match > >> the one in kirkwood.dtsi? > >> > >> Both "ports" need reg =<0> as there is two controllers > >> with one port at 0 on Kirkwood. > > -> > kirkwood.dtsi itself says ethernet1-port at 1 with reg =<1>. +> > kirkwood.dtsi itself says ethernet1-port@1 with reg =<1>. > > > > Changing reg to 0 for eth1 brings: > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ setup a mac for eth1, so there's nothing to lose ;). > (I know again, why I hate this shared/port separation of mv643xx_eth) > > Anyway, can you please try to have both ports reg properties set -> to <0>, with nodes named ethernet0-port at 0 and ethernet1-port at 0, +> to <0>, with nodes named ethernet0-port@0 and ethernet1-port@0, > and the platform_device_alloc in mv643xx_eth modified? In addition I added a static counter for the allocated devs (to not diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e3efd28..5d6c365 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,10 +2,16 @@ "ref\051D88A8E.1060104@gmail.com\0" "ref\020130706233912.00004044@unknown\0" "ref\051D94884.4000204@gmail.com\0" - "From\0jogo@openwrt.org (Jonas Gorski)\0" - "Subject\0Second ethernet on kirkwood does not work when probed through DT\0" + "From\0Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: Second ethernet on kirkwood does not work when probed through DT\0" "Date\0Sun, 7 Jul 2013 13:26:07 +0200\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>\0" + "Cc\0netdev@vger.kernel.org" + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org> + Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> + " Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 12:52:52 +0200\n" @@ -58,16 +64,16 @@ "> >>> Also I noticed that you named eth1's ethernet1-port node wrongly in\n" "> >>> (at least) your kirkwood conversion patch[2]; you used\n" "> >>>\n" - "> >>> ð1 { status = \"okay\"; ethernet1-port at 0 { must be @1--^ phy-handle\n" + "> >>> ð1 { status = \"okay\"; ethernet1-port@0 { must be @1--^ phy-handle\n" "> >>> =<ðphy1>; }; };\n" "> >>\n" - "> >> Can you please try to leave ethernet1-port at 0 and match\n" + "> >> Can you please try to leave ethernet1-port@0 and match\n" "> >> the one in kirkwood.dtsi?\n" "> >>\n" "> >> Both \"ports\" need reg =<0> as there is two controllers\n" "> >> with one port at 0 on Kirkwood.\n" "> >\n" - "> > kirkwood.dtsi itself says ethernet1-port at 1 with reg =<1>.\n" + "> > kirkwood.dtsi itself says ethernet1-port@1 with reg =<1>.\n" "> >\n" "> > Changing reg to 0 for eth1 brings:\n" "> \n" @@ -98,7 +104,7 @@ "> (I know again, why I hate this shared/port separation of mv643xx_eth)\n" "> \n" "> Anyway, can you please try to have both ports reg properties set\n" - "> to <0>, with nodes named ethernet0-port at 0 and ethernet1-port at 0,\n" + "> to <0>, with nodes named ethernet0-port@0 and ethernet1-port@0,\n" "> and the platform_device_alloc in mv643xx_eth modified?\n" "\n" "In addition I added a static counter for the allocated devs (to not\n" @@ -111,4 +117,4 @@ "Regards\n" Jonas -5cbeda817912b2e228b512b4a96240af1543b5c0ea8e50a74a131b026f9aff03 +76b005b24a6d1bfd4faeb190341a09c72e8558c60b933edf938830deb7ba343b
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.