From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Jim Garlick <garlick@llnl.gov>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v9fs:for-linus 7/7] ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:28:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708072812.GC28294@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373259267.1893.7.camel@joe-AO722>
Hi Joe,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:54:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:45 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > In long run I'd like to disable
> > > > the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
> > > > checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot:
> > >
> > > Are you using a .checkpatch.conf file?
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > > > PATCH_PREFIX
> > > > LONG_LINE
> > > > CAMELCASE
> > >
> > > That's a --strict test
> >
> > Yes. The CAMELCASE checks are false positives for the USB subsystem.
> > Where they followed the USB spec and use names like bInterfaceClass
> > all over the places.
>
> The latest version of checkpatch should avoid this.
That'd be great! So I'll use the latest version and take the
CAMELCASE check back.
> > > > MISSING_SIGN_OFF
> > >
> > > Why would you even consider this one?
> >
> > It produces
> >
> > ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
> >
> > on
> > commit: 8bb495e3f02401ee6f76d1b1d77f3ac9f079e376 Linux 3.10
>
> Well, clearly Linus should sign off on his own commits...
Heh.
> > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git master
> > commit: 97966e7ec944580bc3f46712f34ecb3c854fdd4b [37/81] Revert "ALSA: hda - Fix wrong power setup for HP paths of VIA codecs"
> >
> > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git master
> > head: 120b1922175789a8a9bdafb7ea755fc63de2f392
> > commit: 10296279acc5d3caeca7b2cfde329c8280fe67e5 [32/81] Merge branch 'for-linus'
> >
> > and many other commits
>
> Not in -next as of today.
Since I test bleeding edge trees and many of them are not formal enough, I'm
afraid I have to ignore the missing Signed-off-by lines..
10071 F Jul 05 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [asoc:topic/ak4554 0/2] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10087 F Jul 05 Cc fengguang.wu ( 36:0) [sound:master 32/81] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10088 F Jul 05 Cc fengguang.wu ( 36:0) [sound:master 37/81] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10116 F Jul 06 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [x0148406:tmp 0/45] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10117 F Jul 06 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [x0148406:tmp 1/45] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10118 F Jul 06 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [x0148406:tmp 2/45] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10119 F Jul 06 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [x0148406:tmp 3/45] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10120 F Jul 06 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [mmc:mmc-next 0/88] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
10183 F Jul 07 Cc fengguang.wu ( 37:0) [target:target-per-cpu-ida 0/58] ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
> > > > TRAILING_STATEMENTS
> > > False positives? Got an example?
> > tree: git://git.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6 drm-nouveau-next
> > head: d2989b534ef6834ebf2425aecc040b894b567c91
> > commit: 01672ef454307bf63e93defb3599399b678ff58b [3/68] drm/nve0/fifo: copy engine context stored in ramfc, not externally
> >
> > ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
> > #28: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/fifo/nve0.c:146:
> > + case NVDEV_ENGINE_GR : addr = 0x0210; break;
>
> Not false positives.
Yeah, however it does represent a common practice that I feel like
respecting the developers' own choice.
Thanks,
Fengguang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-08 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51d9c6c4.k6qhnvy45dNR8Ghq%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20130708004233.GA8958@localhost>
[not found] ` <CAFkjPTk5EZ_d5BdTTHjgrwdtU1XfZ3go_7ZDCv4Q_oqnn95AHg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-08 3:30 ` [v9fs:for-linus 7/7] ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible Fengguang Wu
2013-07-08 3:54 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-08 4:45 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-07-08 4:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-07-08 4:57 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-07-08 4:54 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-08 7:28 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130708072812.GC28294@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=garlick@llnl.gov \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.