From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: rebase of the device-mapper quilt series
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:55:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20130711015558.GK8530@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
References: <20130711103116.72f41606b87698b476c4d371@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33395 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754210Ab3GKB4E (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:56:04 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130711103116.72f41606b87698b476c4d371@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:31:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Why have you just rebased the device-mapper series

I was confirming there weren't any unexpected conflicts or other issues to
deal with from a point after the block tree went in before generating
the pull request.

Alasdair