From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:10:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712111322.GC3213@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:39:33AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
> > registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
> > gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
> >
> > GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
> >
> > if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
> > a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
> > fine. Skip this check if we're running a UP kernel or if we
> > detect that the hardware only supports a single processor.
> >
> > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Maybe we should just drop the check entirely? It looks like it may
> > just be debug code that won't ever trigger in practice, even on the
> > 11MPCore that caused this code to be introduced.
>
> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and
> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
> is wrong.
>
Ok. How about this?
----8<-----
Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask()
In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
fine. Remove this check because if you're on a multiprocessor
system it's unlikely to be printed unless your DT is wrong or
your hardware is broken.
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 19ceaa60..4fbcea9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
break;
}
- if (!mask)
- pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
-
return mask;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:10:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712111322.GC3213@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:39:33AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
> > registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
> > gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
> >
> > GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
> >
> > if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
> > a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
> > fine. Skip this check if we're running a UP kernel or if we
> > detect that the hardware only supports a single processor.
> >
> > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Maybe we should just drop the check entirely? It looks like it may
> > just be debug code that won't ever trigger in practice, even on the
> > 11MPCore that caused this code to be introduced.
>
> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and
> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
> is wrong.
>
Ok. How about this?
----8<-----
Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask()
In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
fine. Remove this check because if you're on a multiprocessor
system it's unlikely to be printed unless your DT is wrong or
your hardware is broken.
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 19ceaa60..4fbcea9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
break;
}
- if (!mask)
- pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
-
return mask;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-05 23:39 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system Stephen Boyd
2013-07-05 23:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-12 11:13 ` Javi Merino
2013-07-12 11:13 ` Javi Merino
2013-07-12 12:10 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-07-12 12:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 21:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 21:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 23:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 23:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-22 18:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23 4:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-23 4:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-23 4:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23 4:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23 9:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-23 9:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-20 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-20 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-23 17:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-23 17:01 ` Stephen Boyd
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-31 0:43 Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31 0:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31 7:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-31 7:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-31 7:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-12 3:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-12 3:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-12 3:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-01 21:25 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-01 21:25 ` Stefan Agner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.