From: zengxg14 <zengxg14-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "jinho hwang"
<hwang.jinho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
dev <dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: 1 core / 1 port receiving performance discrepancy
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:51:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201307131351011854082@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAPQGAnGQdpo4ZkKO5sQzHYtTFj3EphzPyakCJaSuHFHHR_UUOg@mail.gmail.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]
Hi:
What is your burst size in rte_eth_rx_burst?
Can you provide the shell command you run, both test-pmd and your code?
From: jinho hwang
Date: 2013-07-12 23:46
To: dev
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 1 core / 1 port receiving performance discrepancy
Hi Guys,
I am currently testing my code with two machines(X5650 @ 2.67GHz,
82599EB): one runs my code, and the other runs Pktgen. The first task
is to see how my code performs comparing to test-pmd. Both use only
one port with one core to receive packets. test-pmd uses rxonly mode.
My code only receives packets and discards them right away, and there
are no other processing at all. Different from what I expected,
test-pmd shows 33M packets (do not count on the second --- just total
number of packets sent from Pktgen), whereas mine shows 18M packets
with the same traffic.
I have tried to configure many things such as increasing rx queue
size, increasing max packet receive buffer, but the number did not
make differences.
Can I get some help?
Thank you,
Jinho
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3325 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-13 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-12 15:46 1 core / 1 port receiving performance discrepancy jinho hwang
2013-07-13 5:51 ` zengxg14 [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201307131351011854082@gmail.com \
--to=zengxg14-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hwang.jinho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.