From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Simplify the iteration logic in f_start/f_next
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 20:47:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130718184710.GA4783@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130718184647.GA4761@redhat.com>
f_next() looks overcomplicated, and it is not strictly correct
even if this doesn't matter.
Say, FORMAT_FIELD_SEPERATOR should not return NULL (means EOF)
if trace_get_fields() returns an empty list, we should simply
advance to FORMAT_PRINTFMT as we do when we find the end of list.
1. Change f_next() to return "struct list_head *" rather than
"ftrace_event_field *", and change f_show() to do list_entry().
This simplifies the code a bit, only f_show() needs to know
about ftrace_event_field, and f_next() can play with ->prev
directly
2. Change f_next() to not play with ->prev / return inside the
switch() statement. It can simply set node = head/common_head,
the prev-or-advance-to-the-next-magic below does all work.
While at it. f_start() looks overcomplicated too. I don't think
*pos == 0 makes sense as a separate case, just change this code
to do "while" instead of "do/while".
The patch also moves f_start() down, close to f_stop(). This is
purely cosmetic, just to make the locking added by the next patch
more clear/visible.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 60 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 9d2b499..2c3a8c5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -826,59 +826,33 @@ enum {
static void *f_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct ftrace_event_call *call = m->private;
- struct ftrace_event_field *field;
struct list_head *common_head = &ftrace_common_fields;
struct list_head *head = trace_get_fields(call);
+ struct list_head *node = v;
(*pos)++;
switch ((unsigned long)v) {
case FORMAT_HEADER:
- if (unlikely(list_empty(common_head)))
- return NULL;
-
- field = list_entry(common_head->prev,
- struct ftrace_event_field, link);
- return field;
+ node = common_head;
+ break;
case FORMAT_FIELD_SEPERATOR:
- if (unlikely(list_empty(head)))
- return NULL;
-
- field = list_entry(head->prev, struct ftrace_event_field, link);
- return field;
+ node = head;
+ break;
case FORMAT_PRINTFMT:
/* all done */
return NULL;
}
- field = v;
- if (field->link.prev == common_head)
+ node = node->prev;
+ if (node == common_head)
return (void *)FORMAT_FIELD_SEPERATOR;
- else if (field->link.prev == head)
+ else if (node == head)
return (void *)FORMAT_PRINTFMT;
-
- field = list_entry(field->link.prev, struct ftrace_event_field, link);
-
- return field;
-}
-
-static void *f_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
-{
- loff_t l = 0;
- void *p;
-
- /* Start by showing the header */
- if (!*pos)
- return (void *)FORMAT_HEADER;
-
- p = (void *)FORMAT_HEADER;
- do {
- p = f_next(m, p, &l);
- } while (p && l < *pos);
-
- return p;
+ else
+ return node;
}
static int f_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
@@ -904,8 +878,7 @@ static int f_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
return 0;
}
- field = v;
-
+ field = list_entry(v, struct ftrace_event_field, link);
/*
* Smartly shows the array type(except dynamic array).
* Normal:
@@ -932,6 +905,17 @@ static int f_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
return 0;
}
+static void *f_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ void *p = (void *)FORMAT_HEADER;
+ loff_t l = 0;
+
+ while (l < *pos && p)
+ p = f_next(m, p, &l);
+
+ return p;
+}
+
static void f_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
{
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-18 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-18 18:46 [PATCH 0/2] tracing: minor cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-18 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-07-18 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Do not (ab)use trace_seq in event_id_read() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130718184710.GA4783@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.