Re: [PATCH v2] of: Add more stubs for non-OF builds

[Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:39:22 +0400, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Patch adds of_get_next_child and of_get_next_available_child
> stubs for non-OF builds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/of.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 1fd08ca..c086c1a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -366,8 +366,17 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> -	while (0)
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(
> +	const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
> +	const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
>  
>  static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
>  					const struct device_node *node,
> @@ -376,6 +385,9 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> +	while (0)
> +

Why is the for_each_child_of_node() getting moved?

g.

>  static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
>