From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] mm: shift VM_GROWS* check from mmap_region() to do_mmap_pgoff()
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:22:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130720152246.GA588@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307191900390.986@eggly.anvils>
Andrew,
This patch replaces the buggy
mm-shift-vm_grows-check-from-mmap_region-to-do_mmap_pgoff.patch
I do not send the *-fix.patch because I'd like to update the changelog.
However it needs the explicit ack from Hugh.
On 07/19, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:54:51 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > mmap() doesn't allow the non-anonymous mappings with VM_GROWS* bit set.
> > > In particular this means that mmap_region()->vma_merge(file, vm_flags)
> > > must always fail if vm_flags & VM_GROWS.
>
> I didn't understand that sentence: if file is non-NULL perhaps?
Yes, this looks confusing, sorry.
I meant, vma_merge() must fail if "vm_flags & VM_GROWS" is set incorrectly.
is_mergeable_vma() compares both vm_file and vm_flags.
Even if file == NULL (at this stage), "VM_SHARED | VM_GROWS" is not correct
too, and vma_merge() can't succeed.
And, to clarify, I only mentioned this because I tried to convince myself
that this change (if correct) can't make any difference except "avoid the
not-really-correct do_munmap".
> > > So it does not make sense to
> > > check VM_GROWS* after we already allocated the new vma, the only caller,
> > > do_mmap_pgoff(), which can pass this flag can do the check itself.
> > >
> > > And this looks a bit more correct, mmap_region() already unmapped the
> > > old mapping at this stage. But if mmap() is going to fail, it should
> > > avoid do_munmap() if possible.
>
> I agree with the sentiment, but the patch looks wrong to me.
Heh. You are right of course.
> It did need staring, yes, but it looks NOK to me: this change permits
> mmap(addr, len, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_GROWSDOWN, fd, off)
> where fd is for a real file:
And note that "Only MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS can use MAP_GROWS" even
tries to document that "MAP_PRIVATE && file" is not allowed too.
I have no idea how I managed to forget that MAP_PRIVATE never sets
VM_MAYSHARE.
Thanks a lot Hugh.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-20 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-14 16:54 [PATCH 0/3] simple mmap() cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-14 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: shift VM_GROWS* check from mmap_region() to do_mmap_pgoff() Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-16 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-20 2:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-07-20 15:22 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-22 23:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-07-14 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: do_mmap_pgoff: cleanup the usage of file_inode() Oleg Nesterov
2013-07-14 16:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: mmap_region: kill correct_wcount/inode, use allow_write_access() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130720152246.GA588@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.