Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] xfs: check that eofblocks ioctl caller can write matched inodes

[Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@oracle.com>]

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:02:21 +1000
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:

[...]
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> > index d873ab9e..728283a 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> > @@ -1247,6 +1247,10 @@ xfs_inode_free_eofblocks(
> >  		if (!xfs_inode_match_id(ip, eofb))
> >  			return 0;
> >  
> > +		if (eofb->eof_flags & XFS_EOF_FLAGS_PERM_CHECK &&
> > +		    inode_permission(VFS_I(ip), MAY_WRITE))
> > +			return 0;
> 
> This assumes we are walking fully instantiated VFS inodes. That's
> not necessarily true - we may be walking inodes that have already
> been dropped from the VFS and are waiting for background reclaim to

Hi Dave, in looking at this a bit I don't see how they can be dropped
from the VFS since they are igrab()ed in the flow:

xfs_icache_free_eofblocks
  xfs_inode_ag_iterator_tag
    xfs_inode_ag_walk
      xfs_inode_ag_walk_grab
        igrab

and I don't see a way for xfs_inode_free_eofblocks() to be called other
than the ag_walk flow.

If there is a way to get into xfs_inode_free_eofblocks where we can't
use VFS_I(ip) then it will be a problem for the new code in
xfs_inode_match_id() as well.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs