All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Lisa Nguyen <lisa@xenapiadmin.com>,
	Ian.Campbell@citrix.com,
	Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
	Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: Support 64-bit PV guest receiving NMIs
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:48:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130722144829.GB30300@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ED2255.3060507@citrix.com>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:15:17PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 19/07/13 16:51, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Zhenzhong Duan sent a patch that adds some of this functionality
> > but this code adds the remaining pieces.
> 
> What's this actually referring to?  Which specific commits?

There were no commits. Let me rephrase it.
> 
> > The kernel has the
> > logic to handle Xen-type-exceptions using the paravirt interface
> > in the assembler code (see PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME -
> > pv_irq_ops.adjust_exception_frame and and INTERRUPT_RETURN -
> > pv_cpu_ops.iret).
> > 
> > That means the nmi handler (and other exception handlers) use
> > the hypervisor iret.
> > 
> > The other changes that would be neccessary for this would
> > be to translate the NMI_VECTOR to one of the entries on the
> > ipi_vector and make xen_send_IPI_mask_allbutself use different
> > events.
> > 
> > Fortunately for us commit 1db01b4903639fcfaec213701a494fe3fb2c490b
> > (xen: Clean up apic ipi interface) implemented this and we piggyback
> > on the cleanup such that the apic IPI interface will pass the right
> > vector value for NMI.
> > 
> > With this patch we can trigger NMIs within a PV guest (only tested
> > x86_64).
> 
> I think you also need to test with 32-bit guests.  The VCPUOP_nmi
> hypercall does not appear to be conditional on only 64-bit guest.

Hm, perhaps add a #ifdef CONFIG for that then.

> 
> > 
> > SysRq : Show backtrace of all active CPUs
> > sending NMI to all CPUs:
> > NMI backtrace for cpu 2
> 
> Is this clutter really necessary in a commit message?

I will snip it a bit.
> 
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ enum ipi_vector {
> >  	XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR,
> >  	XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR,
> >  	XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
> > +	XEN_NMI_VECTOR,
> >  
> >  	XEN_NR_IPIS,
> >  };
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > index 2fa02bc..231382a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -427,8 +427,7 @@ static void __init xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
> >  
> >  	if (!xen_initial_domain())
> >  		cpuid_leaf1_edx_mask &=
> > -			~((1 << X86_FEATURE_APIC) |  /* disable local APIC */
> > -			  (1 << X86_FEATURE_ACPI));  /* disable ACPI */
> > +			~((1 << X86_FEATURE_ACPI));  /* disable ACPI */
> >  
> >  	cpuid_leaf1_ecx_mask &= ~(1 << (X86_FEATURE_X2APIC % 32));
> 
> What's this hunk for?  It doesn't appear to be explained in the commit
> message.

Duh. Let me add a comment saying that for PV domU guests we need the 'local APIC'
functionality on to be able to send NMIs.

> 
> > @@ -735,8 +734,7 @@ static int cvt_gate_to_trap(int vector, const gate_desc *val,
> >  		addr = (unsigned long)xen_int3;
> >  	else if (addr == (unsigned long)stack_segment)
> >  		addr = (unsigned long)xen_stack_segment;
> > -	else if (addr == (unsigned long)double_fault ||
> > -		 addr == (unsigned long)nmi) {
> > +	else if (addr == (unsigned long)double_fault) {
> >  		/* Don't need to handle these */
> >  		return 0;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
> > @@ -747,7 +745,12 @@ static int cvt_gate_to_trap(int vector, const gate_desc *val,
> >  		 */
> >  		;
> >  #endif
> > -	} else {
> > +	} else if (addr == (unsigned long)nmi)
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Use the native version as well.
> > +		 */
> > +		;
> > +	else {
> >  		/* Some other trap using IST? */
> >  		if (WARN_ON(val->ist != 0))
> >  			return 0;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > index 94eac5c..f78877c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
> >  /* These are code, but not functions.  Defined in entry.S */
> >  extern const char xen_hypervisor_callback[];
> >  extern const char xen_failsafe_callback[];
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +extern const char nmi[];
> > +#endif
> >  extern void xen_sysenter_target(void);
> >  extern void xen_syscall_target(void);
> >  extern void xen_syscall32_target(void);
> > @@ -525,7 +528,13 @@ void __cpuinit xen_enable_syscall(void)
> >  	}
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
> >  }
> > -
> > +void __cpuinit xen_enable_nmi(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +	if (register_callback(CALLBACKTYPE_nmi, nmi))
> > +		BUG();
> > +#endif
> > +}
> >  void __init xen_arch_setup(void)
> 
> Do we care about hypervisors that don't support this?

What version of them would that be ? Anything prior to 3.4 cannot
boot with the Linux pvops.

> 
> Also, missing blank line.
> 
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> > @@ -572,6 +572,10 @@ static inline int xen_map_vector(int vector)
> >  	case IRQ_WORK_VECTOR:
> >  		xen_vector = XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR;
> >  		break;
> > +	case NMI_VECTOR:
> > +	case APIC_DM_NMI:
> 
> Not clear what this APIC_DM_NMI case is for.

It is used in 'kgdb_roundup_cpus' and if you look in __prepare_ICR
the NMI_VECTOR translates that to APIC_DM_NMI.

Hm, it looks like a bug in the kgdb_roundup_cpus to actually use
that - it should use NMI_VECTOR I think.


> 
> > +		xen_vector = XEN_NMI_VECTOR;
> > +		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		xen_vector = -1;
> >  		printk(KERN_ERR "xen: vector 0x%x is not implemented\n",
> > @@ -659,6 +663,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xen_irq_work_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> 
> Stray blank line added.
> 
> >  static const struct smp_ops xen_smp_ops __initconst = {
> >  	.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu,
> >  	.smp_prepare_cpus = xen_smp_prepare_cpus,
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > index a58ac43..419cc44 100644
> 
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > @@ -1213,6 +1214,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(evtchn_put);
> >  void xen_send_IPI_one(unsigned int cpu, enum ipi_vector vector)
> >  {
> >  	int irq = per_cpu(ipi_to_irq, cpu)[vector];
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * In which the IRQ will be -1.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (unlikely(vector == XEN_NMI_VECTOR)) {
> > +		int rc =  HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_send_nmi, cpu, NULL);
> > +		if (rc < 0)
> > +			printk(KERN_WARNING "Sending nmi to CPU%d failed (rc:%d)\n", cpu, rc);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> 
> Move the assignment of irq after this block, then you can drop the
> (unhelpful) comment.

I guess? I was thinking it would be helpfull to know if it does not work.

> 
> > --- a/include/xen/interface/vcpu.h
> > +++ b/include/xen/interface/vcpu.h
> > @@ -170,4 +170,6 @@ struct vcpu_register_vcpu_info {
> >  };
> >  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(vcpu_register_vcpu_info);
> >  
> > +/* Send an NMI to the specified VCPU. @extra_arg == NULL. */
> > +#define VCPUOP_send_nmi             11
> >  #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_VCPU_H__ */
> 
> Would it be better to get this change with a full sync of the header as
> a separate patch.

Nah, lets keep it change by change. It makes it easier to figure out
what is actually supported.
> 
> David

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-22 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-19 15:51 [PATCH] xen: Support 64-bit PV guest receiving NMIs Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-19 16:19 ` Ben Guthro
2013-07-22 12:15 ` David Vrabel
2013-07-22 14:48   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-07-22 15:26     ` David Vrabel
2013-07-31 17:32       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-01 12:11         ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130722144829.GB30300@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=benjamin.guthro@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad@kernel.org \
    --cc=lisa@xenapiadmin.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.