From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:53:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20130722165355.GA18371@kroah.com> References: <20130722151653.GA7213@sacarino.pirispons.net> <51ED4E2D.5020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48392 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755829Ab3GVQx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:53:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51ED4E2D.5020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: Kiko Piris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM mailing list On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:52:21PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > And both of them have been CC'ed to -stable. So they should be hitting > the stable tree soon. > > Hmm, that reminds me.. whenever a patch cc'ed to stable hit the mainline, > the patch signers used to receive an automatic email from Greg. I didn't > get that for the above two patches.. Did the process change due to the > recent discussions around -stable tree maintenance? No, it did not change, I just have 150+ pending patches for the 3.11-stable tree that I have yet to get through, give me a few weeks please. thanks, greg k-h