From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net (vms173011pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DCEE01525 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.45.150.102]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MQE00H17BYIBWM0@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:49:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4006F2009B; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:49:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:49:29 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Paul Eggleton Message-id: <20130723154929.GD21440@denix.org> References: <59742333.4mCOApeMVS@helios> <1443099.tO82y7b3tx@helios> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <1443099.tO82y7b3tx@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Yocto + meta-networking X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:49:50 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:03:41PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2013 08:56:34 Brian Hutchinson wrote: > > Thanks Paul, I worried about mixing branches since I've never tried that > > before. The only reason I picked Denzil is because I need ti816x support > > and Dylan and Danny don't have machine confs for it in meta-ti. So what > > would be easier, getting the machine support I need in Dylan or back > > porting the net-snmp recipe to Denzil? > > I don't have a feel for the former - if the reason is not already clear you'd > probably want to ask the meta-ti folks why that machine isn't supported in > later branches and how hard it would be to update support. This might be worth Just to update everyone on this list - the issue with ti81x has been discussed on meta-ti list multiple times before and Brian already knew the answer to that. > doing if you're starting something new with denzil, since that's two versions > behind current stable. > > Having said that, backporting the net-snmp recipe should be fairly trivial > though. -- Denys