From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] xl: replace vcpu-set --ignore-host with --ignore-warn
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:17:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130723191744.GC7073@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EEC2EC.8060301@eu.citrix.com>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:52:44PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29:36AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >>On 07/19/2013 04:48 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>When Xen 4.3 was released we had a discussion whether we should
> >>>allow the vcpu-set command to allow the user to set more than
> >>>physical CPUs for a guest. The author brought up:
> >>> - Xend used to do it,
> >>> - If a user wants to do it, let them do it,
> >>> - The original author of the change did not realize the
> >>> side-effect his patch caused this and had no intention of changing it.
> >>> - The user can already boot a massively overcommitted guest by
> >>> having a large 'vcpus=' value in the guest config and we allow
> >>> that.
> >>>
> >>>Since we were close to the release we added --ignore-host parameter
> >>>as a mechanism for a user to still set more vCPUs that the physical
> >>>machine as a stop-gate.
> >>>
> >>>This patch removes said option and adds the --ignore-warn option.
> >>>By default the user is allowed to set as many vCPUs as they would like.
> >>>We will print out a warning if the value is higher than the physical
> >>>CPU count. The --ignore-warn will silence said warning.
> >>
> >>I think this is a good change in general, but I don't think the name
> >>is quite right. You're not ignoring the warnings, you're turning
> >>them off. Maybe make the function argument "warn", and the option
> >>"--no-warn"?
> >
> >--silence?
>
> Well there is some --quiet, but I suppose that generally means don't
> tell me *anything*, which is not what we want either. I would think
> --silence would mean about the same thing.
Good point. In which case I think --no-warn and no short option
makes the most sense.
>
> -George
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 15:48 [RFC PATCH] Add the --ignore-warn parameter (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-19 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] xl: replace vcpu-set --ignore-host with --ignore-warn Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-22 23:29 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-23 14:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-23 17:52 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-23 19:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-07-24 17:14 ` George Dunlap
2013-08-07 10:50 ` Ian Jackson
2013-09-25 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-19 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] xl/create: warn if the 'vcpu' parameter exceeds host physical CPUs Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-19 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] xl/create: Sprinkle the check to silence warnings further Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130723191744.GC7073@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.