From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD9652972 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r6NNxZb5016956; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:59:35 -0500 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6NNxZi2023184; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:59:35 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:59:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (gtudedge.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6NNxYqs032083; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:59:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:59:34 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Christian Gagneraud Message-ID: <20130723235934.GF32068@edge> References: <1331708251.407.1374386154381.JavaMail.jenkins@puget> <51EDE9D0.2000003@gna.org> <20130723031524.GA30573@edge> <51EE0A0A.3020902@gna.org> <20130723060244.GA31158@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130723060244.GA31158@edge> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org Subject: Re: [nightly] Core TISDK 2013.06 build 2013-07-21_01-01-44 X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:59:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:02:45AM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 04:43:54PM +1200, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On 23/07/13 15:15, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >Christian, > > > > > >On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:26:24PM +1200, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > >>Hi there, > > >> > > >>I have been looking at these test/build reports recently, is there a > > >>more detail report available somewhere? > > > > > >Yes, but detailed reports are not yet published externally - it's on my > > >"to do" list. > > > > Good to hear, thanks! I have no strong needs for this, i was just > > curious about the am335x-evm test failures. > > > > > > > > > > >>As a user of a am335x-evm and a BeagleBoard Black, I would like to > > >>know more about test failure for the EVM. > > > > > >There are some issues with the boot sequence of an automated test - looks > > >like it's trying to load a wrong kernel image, I'll look into it later. > > >Otherwise, the latest Dylan build works and boots fine for me on am335x-evm > > >when loaded manually on SD card. So, the issue with am335x-evm tests failining was identified as a bug in the test automation framework and our System Test engineers are working on the fix. For more details: http://arago-project.org/pipermail/opentest/2013-July/002031.html > > >>As well, I'm considering moving from Arago/Danny (kernel 3.2) to > > >>Arago/Dylan (kernel 3.8?). I would like to know if there are any > > >>plan to use Dylan for the next stable Arago. > > > > > >Actually, Arago/Danny has been using kernel 3.8 for quite some time now - we > > >already had couple internal releases with it. You would need to specifically > > >request AM-SDK branding to get 3.2 kernel, as the default is 3.8 in Danny and > > >in Dylan. The only change Dylan brings is to update the underlying Yocto > > >framework with all the user-space apps to the latest versions. > > > > Yes, that's right, Arago/Danny already use kernel 3.8. My mistake! > > To be more precise, my question was related to QA stuff. For now, > > build and test automation are still done with Arago/Danny, any plan > > to switch to or add Arago/Dylan config? > > Yes, indeed - that's the next step. I still need to finish the devkit portion > of our SDK, but otherwise everything seems to be getting ready to switch the > nightly builds and tests to using Dylan. > > > > On the side, any plan to add beaglebone and/or beaglebone-black to > > the list of machines used by your continuous integration systems? > > Starting with kernel 3.8, the only difference between AM335 EVM, EVM-SK and > Beaglebone is in the devtree. When we build for am335x-evm, we copy all the > DTBs, so the same images can be used on SK or Beaglebone. No need to build for > those separately! > > From a run-time testing perspective, those are obviously different tests on > actual boards - I would need to check the board farm for proper setup. BTW, > current nightly tests are sent to our internal board farm, which is shared. I > am working on setting up my own personal board farm - I do have all the > boards, I just need to whip our automation software in shape, which is not an > easy task... > > > > >>Also, do you think it is conceivable to hope for a working Qt5 with > > >>TI OpenGL stuff? > > > > > >It's in the plans. Prabu was able to get it built after some massaging, but > > >there are still few issues. Also, we would need to make sure the fallback > > >mechanism works for legacy devices w/o GLES, since Qt5 requires it... > > > > Interesting! What I found so far: > > - https://github.com/prabindh/qt-configs > > - http://e2e.ti.com/search/default.aspx#q=qt5&g=29&sc=forum > > - and of course https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5, which depends > > on oe master :( > > > > What I would like to achieve by the next months is to provide an > > {arago|angstrom|poxy}-danny-qt5 SDK and custom rootfs to the dev > > guys. Will see how it goes! > > Let us know how it goes. And patches are welcome, as usual! > > -- > Denys > _______________________________________________ > meta-arago mailing list > meta-arago@arago-project.org > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago