From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: IGMP Unsolicited Report Interval too long for IGMPv3? Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:15:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20130726151520.GD1281@kvack.org> References: <51ED998D.7000300@youview.com> <20130722211855.GL19643@kvack.org> <20130722215108.GG6538@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130725.164253.690113010547536005.davem@davemloft.net> <20130726131123.GC1281@kvack.org> <20130726150651.GD3890@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: David Miller , william.manley@youview.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([205.233.56.17]:37868 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757566Ab3GZPPY (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:15:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130726150651.GD3890@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:06:51PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:11:23AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > I think Hannes' patch is good step in the right direction, so please add: > > Acked-by: Benjamin LaHaise > > I just send a new patch with the priority changes for ipv4 included. I copied > your Acked-by, I hope this is ok. Sure, no problem. Thanks for fixing this. -ben -- "Thought is the essence of where you are now."