From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Jason Rosenberg <jbr@squareup.com>
Cc: stan@hardwarefreak.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: understanding speculative preallocation
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:42:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130726214238.GM1681@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA+BczTt-ZN7DU8gpWAY0SdL0KWL2Z_y8qKvmxMn7b+T9frK4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:11:55PM -0400, Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> Is it safe to say that speculative preallocation will not be used if a file
> is opened read-only?
The blocks will only be reserved on an appending write.
> It turns out that the kafka server does indeed write lots of log files, and
> rotate them after they reach a max size, but never closes the files until
> the app exits, or until it deletes the files. This is because it needs to
> make them available for reading, etc. So, an obvious change for kafka
> might be to close each log file after rotating, and then re-open it
> read-only for consumers of the data. Does that sound like a solution that
> would pro-actively release pre-allocated storage?
An interesting idea, and I'm not quite sure. The blocks past EOF are freed in
xfs_release on close in some circumstances, and it looks like you have a chance
to call xfs_free_eofblocks (at least in the most uptodate codebase) if you did
not use explicit preallocation (e.g. fallocate or an xfs ioctl) and did not
open it append-only. You could reopen with read-write flags and it wouldn't
make a difference vs read-only, so long as you don't do an appending write.
Seems like it's worth a try. Another possibility is to look into what would
happen if you do a truncate up to i_size when you're ready to stop appending to
the file. I haven't checked that out though.
Regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 7:23 understanding speculative preallocation jbr
2013-07-26 11:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-26 17:40 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 19:27 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-26 19:43 ` A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation) Jay Ashworth
2013-07-27 3:52 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-27 21:00 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-28 1:38 ` aurfalien
2013-07-28 1:50 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-28 2:08 ` aurfalien
2013-07-28 2:21 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-28 5:09 ` Purpose of the XFS list -- was: " Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-28 15:45 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-08-14 17:01 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-07-28 7:18 ` Stefan Ring
2013-07-28 15:48 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-29 0:06 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 2:41 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-29 3:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 4:11 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-29 14:33 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 15:25 ` Dave Howorth
2013-07-29 3:38 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-29 4:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 4:57 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-29 13:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 18:15 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-29 14:24 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 14:36 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 14:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 15:30 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 17:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 0:00 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-28 5:15 ` Michael L. Semon
2013-07-26 20:38 ` understanding speculative preallocation Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 20:50 ` Ben Myers
2013-07-26 21:04 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 21:11 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 21:42 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-07-27 1:30 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-28 2:19 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-29 0:04 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-26 21:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-27 4:26 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-27 1:26 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-26 7:35 jbr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130726214238.GM1681@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=jbr@squareup.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.