Re: [PATCH] regulator: pfuze100: Use regulator_map_voltage_ascend

[Robin Gong <b38343@freescale.com>]

Yes, it's reasonable from performance view.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:38:58PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> All table based voltage list have ascendant order.
> Use regulator_map_voltage_ascend for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> index e9e8ae3..dbb6e1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops = {
>  
>  static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops = {
>  	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table,
> +	.map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
>  	.set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
>  	.get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> 
>