From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4ADE013D1 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (unknown [88.170.243.169]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020F9A61D3; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:48:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:48:04 +0200 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20130729144804.14a201d4@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <20130610151853.7c658ffc@e6520eb> <1370871307-27783-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <20130729142511.6efe89bb@e6520eb> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v7] qt5: add mx5 and mx6 support X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:48:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:45:54 -0300, Otavio Salvador a =E9crit : > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Eric B=E9nard wrote: > > Hi Otavio, > > > > Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:35:07 +0200, > > Eric B=E9nard a =E9crit : > > > >> - this allow to build qt5 with OpenGL ES support for i.MX5 and i.MX6 > >> - tested on i.MX51, i.MX53 and i.MX6Q > >> - X11 support is not yet tested so we don't change the core settings > >> when x11 is in DISTRO_FEATURES > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric B=E9nard > >> --- > >> v7: don't change the core configuration when x11 is in DISTRO_FEATURES > >> > > May you please give me more details on what prevent this patch from > > being applied to master ? > > I have some work on QT5/X11 (now compiles fine and needs some testing) > > so if some rework is still needed I can do it at the same time. >=20 > It is the missing part. I'd like to have X11 working to not break it. >=20 actually it's not breaking X11 : the current patch is irgnoring the X11 case and doesn't touch anything when building for X. So may you please merge it as X11 tests will take some time. Eric