From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: cgroups and SCHED_IDLE Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20130729152529.GD22156@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <51CC7392.8080701@keymile.com> <51D139B4.8070407@keymile.com> <20130723155634.GD18458@mtj.dyndns.org> <51F65F3D.1080503@keymile.com> <20130729140723.GB22156@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <51F686E7.6020200@keymile.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51F686E7.6020200-SkAbAL50j+5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Holger Brunck Cc: Tejun Heo , mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, "Germs, Frits (extern)" , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:14:47PM +0200, Holger Brunck wrote: > no, unfortunately I got the same results as before. OK, so I'm a little confused; this works on SMP but not on UP? There's lots of mention of various platforms, but since I simply don't know any of them its not clear if they're UP or not. Typically the cgroup nightmare is easier on UP; it would be curious if that's the 'broken' case now :-)