From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tj@kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:44:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729194452.GA31864@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130729190431.GJ24782@lunn.ch>
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:04:31PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> > into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> > The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> > but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> > the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
>
> What architectures did you compile this for? PowerPC and x86 as well
> as ARM? I _think_ this driver is also used there, and i _think_
> without some #ifdef, it failed to build. But maybe since then, the
> common clock is now available on all architectures?
>
Using COMPILE_TEST=y, I've compiled with a working ARM config,
as well as with a MMU-less ARM (with COMMON_CLK=n).
And now that you mention x86, I've compiled it with an x86 config
(with COMMON_CLK=n).
I'm not sure this particular change is architecture dependent (at least
nowadays), since by looking at include/linux/clk.h it seems pretty
straightforward that all the operations are no-ops if HAVE_CLK=n.
Am I missing something?
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 15:21 [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-29 15:21 ` [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-29 16:00 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 16:51 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-29 19:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-29 19:44 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-07-29 15:59 ` [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130729194452.GA31864@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.