From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:25:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20130730142517.GA29015@kroah.com> References: <51F74BC8.7020903@ti.com> <20130730060134.GD9155@radagast> <51F7590B.4020705@ti.com> <20130730061830.GE9155@radagast> <51F75C40.4060406@ti.com> <20130730062844.GH9155@radagast> <51F7613C.5070803@ti.com> <20130730071611.GD16441@radagast> <51F7752B.8050804@ti.com> <20130730081520.GH16441@radagast> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40658 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756076Ab3G3OX7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:23:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130730081520.GH16441@radagast> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, eballetbo@gmail.com, javier@dowhile0.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:15:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > look at Greg's and my reply to that email. > > > > but finally Greg agreed to what Tomasz proposed no? > > that's not what I see in the thread. I see Greg agreed to regulator's > own IDs being sequentially created, but he mentions device names can > change. And that no one should _ever_ rely on them to be a specific "name", the bus is responsible for creating the id, it could be "random" and everything should work just fine. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:25:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy In-Reply-To: <20130730081520.GH16441@radagast> References: <51F74BC8.7020903@ti.com> <20130730060134.GD9155@radagast> <51F7590B.4020705@ti.com> <20130730061830.GE9155@radagast> <51F75C40.4060406@ti.com> <20130730062844.GH9155@radagast> <51F7613C.5070803@ti.com> <20130730071611.GD16441@radagast> <51F7752B.8050804@ti.com> <20130730081520.GH16441@radagast> Message-ID: <20130730142517.GA29015@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:15:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > look at Greg's and my reply to that email. > > > > but finally Greg agreed to what Tomasz proposed no? > > that's not what I see in the thread. I see Greg agreed to regulator's > own IDs being sequentially created, but he mentions device names can > change. And that no one should _ever_ rely on them to be a specific "name", the bus is responsible for creating the id, it could be "random" and everything should work just fine. thanks, greg k-h